| Don't Let This Happen to You Article |
Parents  Loading... Articles
| Don't Let This Happen to You   | 
| Page Type: Article Activities: Mountaineering | Page By: knoback Created/Edited: Jul 15, 2006 / Jul 16, 2006 Object ID: 207618 Hits: 5724  Loading... Page Score: 88.31% - 11 Votes  Loading... Vote: Log in to vote |
Protecting Alpine and Mountaineering Routes At first glance, this article may seem redundant. The subject has been covered ad nauseum in climbing magazines and texts such as Freedom of the Hills and Extreme Alpinism. Those two books in particular cover risk assessment, the basic physics of safety systems, and the specifics of gear selection and placement quite well. However, all those sources rely on some unstated premises as the basis for their advice.
Those premises are things “everyone knows”, but nevertheless are tied to numerous accidents and epics. The goal of this exercise is to fill in the gaps and say what has previously been implied or taken for granted. I hope it will also prompt some discussion.
Strategy All climbing begins on the couch. Eyes skim a few words on the page, an image flashes past the car window and a plan begins to form. Most people research their objectives to determine how they will get to the climb, how they will get up and how they will get down. Fewer consider how they will know things are going badly and why they will bail.
Decisions about bailing are driven by commitment level. Those decisions should be based on criteria that are as specific and objective as possible. Are you willing to face a 20 ft. run out? How about a 30 ft. run out? At the crag, it pays to take a deep breath and push past that sort of difficulty. It likely represents a short obstacle on an established, 200 ft. route. It may be the same in the mountains, or it may mark the beginning of 2-3 pitches of muy picante. How long is the crux of your route likely to be? How long are you willing to climb beneath those seracs? Where do you have to be by early afternoon to get down by dark?
If you ask these questions during the research phase, you can make quick, reasonable decisions on the climb, even if you are tired and dehydrated. Many people avoid this process because they feel it is defeatist, but it leads to realism not defeatism. It might even lead you to realize you are willing to do whatever it takes to climb the route. Very well then, say, “Bushido to wa shinu koto to mitsuke tare.”, and start soloing. At least you will have chosen your fate rather than having it thrust upon you. And you will have chosen the proper tactic for your objective
Tactics Once the research is done and the walking starts, the next crux is figuring out where the approach ends and the climb begins. Seems simple enough, but think how many people find themselves balancing on a tiny ledge or steep snow slope trying to hang on to their pack while they wriggle into their harness. No matter what the sun is doing to the ice up there, it is always faster and safer to gear up before you are forced to gear up.
After the harnesses are on, the very next thing to touch is the rack. However reassuring it feels, soloing roped together is a very bad thing. If you are uncomfortable enough to tie in, place some gear. If you don’t want to slow down and climb pitches, simulclimb. Keep as much rope out as you can. Let the terrain guide you. Most of us can’t blaze up moderate ground forever without stopping occasionally to catch our breath. So, look ahead and pick out an easy placement, then push toward it. With surprisingly little practice, you will get there just when you would need a breather anyway. And if you are taking the easy placements, stops for cleaning gear will hardly break your stride
More tactics The same principle is true for climbing pitches. Even a finely honed team won’t get through a 17 or even a 7 pitch route unless they run it out on moderate ground. But you should start looking for a placement before the end of that romp up the easy stuff. Teetering on frontpoints trying to scrape out your first protection in 50 ft. is way slower and way more draining than placing that gear at the base of the hard section 10 or 15 ft. below. Protect the crux if you can, but if you can’t at least you are facing a broken leg rather than a broken back if it all goes wrong.
After the difficult sections, consolidate your position. Gear placed at this point will serve as a directional and offers a margin of safety if the opportunities for anchors above are poor. In the same spirit, if you see a good spot for a belay, stop and take it too. So what if you are only 40 meters out? A solid, 5 minute anchor at 40 meters is better than a rickety, 20 minute anchor at 60 meters.
Some things never change. This approach helps you maintain a redundant safety system. That system ideally has 3 layers. The base is the belay anchor. The next layer is the intervening gear. Finally, the point is you. The leader must not fall; that is so negative. How about, skill, including knowledge of your skill, is your primary safety system. In other words, the idea is to apply yourself so you don’t get sketched out and fall rather than getting sketched out and then grimly hanging on so you don’t fall.
I can’t claim much authority to say what I have said. Much of it though, comes from my betters either through conversation or observation. No one has to abide by these principles, (except for the part about not soloing roped together), to survive, succeed, or climb well. They simply seem to make things smoother and cut down on the fear factor.
Images
|
|