Very good looking, and much higher than it appears in the photos. The white rock appears to be very solid (and abrasive) for sandstone. The red rock and the limestone layers are not as solid, but the white rock appears to be good and would offer some good cracks.
PS, check out the summit tower on this one. Photos don't tell the whole story and the towers are much higher than anything around Moab. They all look tough.
BobSmith - Apr 4, 2005 9:09 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice post.
Dean - Apr 4, 2005 9:57 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice !!!
wildstar - Apr 4, 2005 11:15 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentGood looking page, nice work.
rpc - Apr 5, 2005 12:19 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page Scott.
Good lookin' rock face?
Scott - Apr 5, 2005 12:25 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentVery good looking, and much higher than it appears in the photos. The white rock appears to be very solid (and abrasive) for sandstone. The red rock and the limestone layers are not as solid, but the white rock appears to be good and would offer some good cracks.
Scott - Apr 5, 2005 12:29 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentPS, check out the summit tower on this one. Photos don't tell the whole story and the towers are much higher than anything around Moab. They all look tough.
Split Mountain-South
mtwashingtonmonroe - Apr 5, 2005 6:49 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat page Scott! This is a beautiful mountain indeed. Have a good one!
-Britt
desainme - Apr 5, 2005 9:09 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentLooks like you had a good outing. I didn't realize this type of mountain was not so far from Kings and Emmons.
Joseph Bullough - Apr 7, 2005 8:40 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood job Scott.