Carstensz Pyramid Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|Seems to be missing information, but overall a decent page. More pictures would help emensely.|
|Posted May 28, 2002 6:05 pm|
your wish is my command. More info added as well as pictures, more to follow this week.
|Posted Mar 29, 2004 5:35 am|
|William Marler||Untitled Comment|
|Overall an interesting page. More detail and some better lodistics such as flying into and out of the nearest major city. How much are the helecopter rentals. How may people attempt this peak each year. Stuff like that. Do you have more images?|
|Posted Jun 7, 2002 7:36 am|
|Some more photos and maps and such would be nice. Good page overal.|
|Posted Oct 24, 2002 7:49 am|
added more photos, maps are hard as they are unreadable at SP's format, I have them in larger format at the 7summits site.
|Posted Mar 29, 2004 5:55 am|
|Great beginning info, but for a "Seven Summits" peak, it should have more information. Try to expand on the page.|
|Posted Feb 21, 2003 12:17 pm|
The Heighest Summit of Oceana is the Puncak Jaya of the Maoke mountains range.
The name Carstensz Pyramid was changed on 1968, date of the officially Orange's recognition of the Indonesia Republic (born on 1945). It's not the name of a summit of the Group of Puncak.........
The Puncak Jaya is sited in the Irian Jaya Indonesian district, on the New Guinea Island. Papua is extremely wrong. Papua-New Guinea is another country, bordering with the first (Indonesia) one but not the same. The Island is called only and simply: "New Guinea", Papua is an error, a country has this name, not an island.
Surveys of 1961, 1971 and 1981 tell about 5030 mts. height. A new laser survey on 1999 by ESA and Nasa's sats confirm the elevation in about 5029.838 meters (about 16503 feet).....
No 5130, no 4800 or other inventions.....
When did that mountain lose 150 meters?
Please correct the errors.
|Posted Mar 28, 2003 12:19 pm|
thanks for your vote; I changed a lot on the page recently
The official name of the area has been changed to Papua a few years ago, see the links at the main page. The information therefore is correct.
Please see my explantion at the comments about the height/name issue.
|Posted Mar 28, 2004 12:58 pm|
|Johan Heersink||Untitled Comment|
|Contains some inacurate information and the page has not been updated for a long time.|
29-3-2004: I have upgraded my vote as the much necessary upgrading has been done.
|Posted Jan 5, 2004 1:55 am|
|Good improvements. Please keep updating. Thanks for making the changes.|
|Posted Mar 27, 2004 12:36 am|
page is updated now :-)
|Posted Mar 28, 2004 2:26 pm|
The page is updated now :-)
|Posted Mar 28, 2004 2:26 pm|
|The Lower Marmot||Untitled Comment|
|Your improvements were much needed, and helped a lot. You have improved this page very much, but I ask that you continue to keep the page up to date. Realizing that news may not happen all the time, I know that this is not always practical, but I only ask that you make an effort to keep this page a page of the highest quality.|
|Posted Mar 28, 2004 9:53 pm|
|nice work seems the changes have worked well|
|Posted Apr 13, 2004 9:15 am|
|Posted May 27, 2004 8:44 pm|
|John Climber||Untitled Comment|
|Complete page. Maybe it could be a nice idea to make an sketch of the way up on one of the photos of the mountain to complete the 'Normal Route' description?|
Tot ziens! ;-)
|Posted Dec 17, 2005 4:09 am|