Colorado 13ers > Comments
Colorado 13ers Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|This is a sweet list, I'll attatch it to my thirteener pages. Every once in a while ya'll will need to update links, how fun!|
|Posted Apr 5, 2006 1:35 am|
|Nice job, I did not know that there were that many 13ers in CO.|
|Posted Apr 5, 2006 12:25 pm|
|Although I have maintained my own list of these in an excel file, this is great work with all of the mapping and lnks to the respective pages. Kudos on a job well done!|
|Posted Apr 5, 2006 3:31 pm|
|Will be very handy.|
|Posted Apr 7, 2006 6:02 pm|
|UN13,768 Holy cross Ridge is covered in my Holy Cross Ridge page. Currently there is no link.|
|Posted Apr 15, 2006 2:29 am|
|Linked. I’m surprised I missed that one.|
|Posted Apr 15, 2006 3:37 am|
|This list is a great resource! Thank you very much for all of your efforts.|
|Posted Apr 17, 2006 1:16 am|
|It would be great if you could number the ranks of the peaks so that the peaks with the same elevation have the same rank. This is the way it is done on other sites like Lists of John. This makes the bicentennial list make more sense, in that since there are five peaks at 13580, they are all ranked 198th, and the last two aren't off the list just because of alphabetization.|
|Posted Apr 20, 2006 3:34 pm|
Though I admire John for trying something different, he and I don't agree on this.
I agree with you when you say that alphabetical order is far too arbitrary a thing to break rank ties. Therefore, I prefer to break ties with prominence (and when there's a prominence tie, as well, to use isolation to break the tie). I simply don't like the idea of peaks not having a unique rank, and this also makes it easier on a spreadsheet for sorting purposes. Prominence information will be added to this list once I finish double-checking Roach's figures (he has a number of errors), so this method of breaking ties will be clearer at that point.
|Posted Apr 20, 2006 9:48 pm|
|Nice work here guys. Having done tables in html lately, I can appreciate the time this must have taken.|
|Posted Apr 21, 2006 10:58 pm|
|Brad Snider||Some of CO's best mountains!|
|Great list!!! Thanks for your work on this.|
One small note: McNamee Peak can be linked to the "Clinton, McNamee, Traver" Peaks page. Thanks.
|Posted May 4, 2006 2:29 am|
|Gareth||Re: Some of CO's best mountains!|
|Linked. It’s strange that I linked the other two and missed McNamee. Glad you like the list.|
|Posted May 4, 2006 2:59 am|
|km_donovan||This Page Rates 5 Beiners!|
|Two ice axes up for a great job.|
|Posted Jul 30, 2006 7:41 pm|
|RyanS||Re: Long time|
|Truth be told, not a ton. There's a relatively easy way to convert a spreadsheet into table form, and Gareth got the legwork done quickly. To keep it current, it's just a matter of adding new SP links when people submit new pages.|
|Posted Apr 13, 2007 5:03 pm|
Just noticed that there is no link to Ruby's page, I'm sure updating these is a huge project in itself.
|Posted Jul 6, 2008 12:47 pm|
|Gareth||Re: Ruby Mountain|
|It's now linked. Nice catch!|
|Posted Jul 6, 2008 1:46 pm|
|Sarah Simon||Please attached "Cupid"|
Please attach my new-ish "Cupid" page to this list.
PS: I tried to do attach this myself, but it seems the permissions are set so that "self service attachment" is not an option.
|Posted Dec 31, 2008 4:30 pm|
|Gareth||Re: Please attached|
You did the trick and attached the page. I went in and linked the table to the page. Thanks for helping me keep the new pages linked!
|Posted Jan 1, 2009 4:40 pm|
|mattpayne11||Link to "South Snowdon"|
|Posted May 20, 2009 9:58 pm|
|JustinShapiro||Link to Jenkins Mountain|
|Awsome list but guys, you gotta update the links.|
Link for Jenkins Mountain:
|Posted Sep 4, 2009 5:40 pm|