Becca di Luseney Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|Welcome to SP, Johannes!|
I support your start, but in Overview section you must write something about mountain, add some information about peak/mountain. Peak as Becca de Luseney with more than 3500 m really deserve better page and seriously approach. Description of routes you can add also in Overview section or in new Routes Overview section, which you can create and change classical form/structure.
Also, put some photo as Signature ID photo in your Edit section. Put the number 186596 and this photo should be signature ID photo.
More one thing - make some links lively. Read some Basic HTML Instructions.
Anyway, i'll give you now 4 stars. I hope that you will soon improve your page.
I wish you enjoyment on SP and lot of your new great pages.
|Posted Oct 1, 2005 3:35 pm|
|maybe add some equipment notes and what effects "if in good condition"|
|Posted Oct 1, 2005 11:37 pm|
|Welcome on SP. OK, this the start, but follow the suggestion of the other SP members, your page will be improved easily.|
|Posted Oct 2, 2005 2:49 am|
|Antonio Giani||Re: Untitled Comment|
|Ho aggiustato un pò la pagina della becca di luseney...|
|Posted Jan 10, 2008 12:42 pm|
|William Marler||Untitled Comment|
|Information is a little thin. Could be improved.|
|Posted Oct 3, 2005 9:17 am|
|See wujisic's comments.|
Tell me when upgrades are made and I'll up the vote.
|Posted Oct 3, 2005 8:12 pm|
|Also see Wujisic's and Corax's comments, I will upgrade my vote as well when changes have been made. Welcome to SP.|
|Posted Oct 3, 2005 10:16 pm|
|The page is still largely incomplete, notwithstanding all the suggestions received.|
Practically it consists only in the description of the north route and no general information has been given in the overview.
I'll be glad to change my vote in the case of substantial improvements.
|Posted Dec 17, 2005 8:29 pm|
|now it's really better !|
|Posted Jan 10, 2008 12:37 pm|
|Antonio Giani||Re: OK|
|Posted Jan 10, 2008 12:40 pm|