Welcome to SP!  -
Google Earth: A New Tool for Mountaineering
Article

Google Earth: A New Tool for Mountaineering

  Featured on the Front Page
Google Earth: A New Tool for Mountaineering

Page Type: Article

Object Title: Google Earth: A New Tool for Mountaineering

Activities: Hiking, Mountaineering, Scrambling, Canyoneering, Skiing

 

Page By: gimpilator

Created/Edited: Dec 17, 2006 / Jul 26, 2009

Object ID: 252270

Hits: 8300 

Page Score: 95.05%  - 52 Votes 

Vote: Log in to vote

 

Google.com has just come out with another wonder called Google Earth. As I understand it, this free download software uses actual satellite photographs taken within the last few years and overlays them onto basic topographic information. The result is a three dimensional representation of the entire planet! Knowing this made me wonder, "How would a simulated landscape compare to the real world?"








Mount Shuksan Actual Photograph


Mount Shuksan Simulated View
© 2006 Google Earth




The technology that makes this program possible was first released under the name of Keyhole. After Google.com purchased the rights, they proceeded to make many improvements. What does this have to do with Summit Post, you ask? I titled this article “A New Tool for Mountaineering” because future versions of Google Earth technology have great potential for the trip planning stages of expeditions. The way it is now, before mountaineers go into a remote area that is unknown, they spend time reviewing topographic maps to get a better understanding about the lay of the land. Google Earth can provide a better idea of what the terrain looks like in 3 dimensions. It would not be surprising to see Google Earth links or the equivalent appear underneath the Topozone Map links currently included on Summit Post mountain pages.








Three Fingers Actual Photograph


Three Fingers Simulated View
© 2006 Google Earth




One of the best features of Google Earth is the degree to which it is interactive, although some of the controls are still a little difficult to use. A user has the ability to zoom in and out (even to outer space), pan here and there, and click and drag. With a good internet connection, the program will download increasingly detailed photographs the closer you zoom. There is also a feature that allows you to type in the place name or address for automatic viewing. Another feature enables the use of lat/lon coordinates to find your area of interest automatically. This is especially handy for mountaineering interests considering that the names of wilderness areas and mountain ranges are not included in the database. My personal favorite in terms of capabilities is the placemark option. If you want to save a specific location, like Mount Kilimanjaro (see image below), so that you can find it quickly from 50 miles up in space, using one of the drop-down menus, it is easy to do.






Mount Kilimanjaro Simulated with Placemark
© 2006 Google Earth




You may notice places of high interest including large cities have much greater detail than mountainous or forested areas. A lot could be said about viewing populated areas but I will not cover that here. The lack of finite detail makes Google Earth worthless for inspecting technical rock or ice routes, except the approach. Sorry climbers. Another thing you will notice is that the majority of the topographic structure is extremely simplified and under-exaggerated. To see an example of this, take a look at the small hill that is the Eiffel Tower in Paris. As Scott Patterson has pointed out, there are also some areas left, like the North side of Easter Island, which contain almost no detail whatsoever. Both photo-definition and topographic detail should continue to increase in the future. Google Earth is a work in progress and just a prototype of technology to come. There are two upgraded versions available for a price, one of which incorporates the use of GPS, the other intended for commercial use.








Eldorado Peak Actual Photograph


Eldorado Peak Simulated View
© 2006 Google Earth



To gain basic foresight into an unknown landscape is invaluable information. This principle has made topographic maps an essential. When considering Google Earth, it will be up to the individual to determine it’s potential value in mountaineering. You can download it here. Explore, have fun and be sure to let me know what you think of it.




Last of all, I must voice a concern about posting this article. It would be a shame if SP became flooded with Google Earth images. I think most users will agree, there is absolutely no substitute for pictures of the real thing. Please respect Summit Post by not filling image galleries with computer-generated pictures. I will lead the example by not submitting all these Google Earth screen snapshots as individual images to Summit Post.

Images

Temporary image for article

Comments


[ Post a Comment ]
Viewing: 1-20 of 43 « PREV 1 2 3 NEXT » 

cgrishanice

cgrisha

Voted 10/10

some time I use Google for finding good places to hiking, and I wait for more improvement of detail of the mountains and routs and trails :D
Posted Dec 17, 2006 6:34 pm

gimpilatorRe: nice

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

It is a good tool and has much potential, but also has a lot of room for improvement. Thanks for the comment!
Posted Dec 17, 2006 6:51 pm

Mark DoironNice Article, But ...

Mark Doiron

Voted 10/10

I said: "I placed the Google Earth map coordinates on the page and if someone copies and pastes them into Google Earth ..."

Well, with my son's help I've improved on that. Now I have a clickable link such that the reader will have Google Earth open and be taken to the view I suggest for that area. Here's the one for Marmot Rocks.

It was cranky to figure out exactly how to get the bookmark I wanted. Once I did, I saved it to "My Places", then FTP'd the saved .kmz file to my ISP's web server. After that it's a simple link to the .kmz from the SP web page. Pretty nifty!

--mark d.
Posted Dec 18, 2006 1:32 pm

gimpilatorRe: Nice Article, But ...

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

Mark, it's great to hear that you were able to find such a good use for Google Earth already. I'll try to make some edits tonight. Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Adam
Posted Dec 18, 2006 3:54 pm

ScottNice, but not the entire planet

Scott

Voted 10/10

The result is a three dimensional representation of the entire planet!

I have noticed however that it really isn't comprehensive and only covers certain areas. Some areas in the world aren't even covered at all by Google Earth except for very small or non-existant resolution, and as you know even some of the more remote areas in the lower 48 don't have clear images, nor even close, and no useful 3-D can be generated. Many places in the world aren't covered at all, so it's really not the entire planet.

On the areas that are covered however, it is awesome!

Nice article though. A 10/10.
Posted Dec 18, 2006 3:10 pm

gimpilatorRe: Nice, but not the entire planet

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

You have a point here. In my exploration I did encounter some areas that had very low definition and could not be of much use, but I didn't find anywhere that was blank. I might have to re-write the introduction. I read somewhere that the Google staff is constantly making improvements and updating the information on their database that connects to the program on our computers. And as Mark mentioned, there is and improved version for sale. I look forward to the future and an increase in quality. Thanks for the comment.
Posted Dec 18, 2006 4:05 pm

ScottRe: Nice, but not the entire planet

Scott

Voted 10/10

In my exploration I did encounter some areas that had very low definition and could not be of much use, but I didn't find anywhere that was blank.

If you're curious and want to see one applicable to Summitpost, try my page below:

Page

Notice the error message. You can actually zoom way out and get a dot, but nothing of use. Some of the other sizable Pacific Islands and some other areas don't show up at all at any resolution. Some other areas in various places in the world are completely blanked out due to cloud cover.

Just in case you were curious.
Posted Dec 18, 2006 4:33 pm

gimpilatorRe: Nice, but not the entire planet

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

I can see what you mean. It looks like they didn't finish the photos of the island. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 4:10 am

ScottRe: Nice, but not the entire planet

Scott

Voted 10/10

I can see what you mean. It looks like they didn't finish the photos of the island.

Yep, most of the smaller Pacific Islands don't show up. Other problem areas are the Andes Mountains of Colombia and Ecuador. The vast majority are blanked out from cloud cover, or just blank. Much of the Guiana Highlands as well.

Still, a good tool for much of the world. Once again, good job.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 4:31 pm

Ammon HatchLove Google Earth

Ammon Hatch

Voted 10/10

I've been using it for years now. Once upon a time it was called "keyhole" and was developed by nvidia. Back then it was a subscription and I only played with it for a trial period. One very fine day, google bought the technology and made it free :)

Last fall I was in a geology class at the University of Utah, and my professor pulled up google earth to demonstrate areas of interest (one point in specific is the plate margins just west of northern california, oregon and washington). Needless to say, I was very stoked.

One sunday I was bored and placemarked all of the California and Colorado 14ers. I have all of the western state highpoints as well.

With GPS data and the help of www.gpsvisualizer.com, you can create a 3D overlay of a route you've taken! I did so on Rocky Mouth Canyon Peak, and Gobblers Knob. Someone else had done it for Lone Peak already. I believe you can also do it with google earth premium.

I've used it to figure out where I was when I didn't go where I was supposed to. I've used sketchup to make 3D representations of buildings in Salt Lake and the outlaw cabin in the Lone Peak area. I am a Google Earth addict. Excellent Article.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 11:19 am

gimpilatorRe: Love Google Earth

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

When I decided to write this article I didn't expect to learn so much. Now I am learning from you readers. I sure would like to try the GPS route feature of the upgraded version. I think it's only $20. Thank you for your experience and knowledge. I have used it to update the article.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 4:36 pm

desainmeI use this all the time

desainme

Voted 10/10

Fom simulating a drive to looking at Mtns on SP. Baxter Park in Maine and the Elk Mtns and much of New Hampshire have impressive definition. Annapurna and the Matterhorn need some real attention.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 1:27 pm

viewfinderRe: I use this all the time

Hasn't voted

When did you last check out Annapurna and Matterhorn? Both were substantially improved by a terrain update on November 23.
Posted Jan 18, 2007 1:11 am

desainmeRe: I use this all the time

desainme

Voted 10/10

Thanks- I have noticed the upgrade at the Matterhorn and Annapurna and quite a few improvements in the Rockies too.
Posted Jan 18, 2007 2:52 am

MoapaPkGood article, imperfect tool

MoapaPk

Voted 10/10

I've a couple beefs with Google:

1) the photos are often really misregistered, so if you plot a gps track, it may be off by 200 meters. That makes it hard to pin down which drainage one takes, etc. They could use a local "nudge" tool.

2) the underlying DEMs (digital elevation models) are coarse, so cliffs on steep mountains are deceivingly muted.
Posted Dec 19, 2006 2:25 pm

swm88erGood article!

swm88er

Voted 10/10

I think that Google earth can be a very helpful tool, especially in seeing how accurate topo maps are. From my (limited) experience it seems as if topo maps can be a little mis-leading at times. From what it sounds like (correct me if I’m wrong), as they continue to update the (digital) topo maps from 100k to 24k, our topo maps will be more accurate and google earth will only get better!
Posted Dec 19, 2006 4:22 pm

CBoldt1010Great Article

CBoldt1010

Hasn't voted

I use it all the time and have been for years. The upgraded versions offer a lot for GPS route planning and such. Just recently they have started adding trails and routes for US State and National parks. Others are sure to follow for places all over the world!

I think it is a great tool for what it can offer and can help plan for better trips. Great article!
Posted Dec 19, 2006 5:48 pm

gimpilatorRe: Great Article

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

I have not yet seen the upgraded versions but it's exciting to hear that routes and trails are being added. Thank you for your comment/compliment. And my thanks goes out to everyone else for such a positive response.
Posted Dec 20, 2006 1:58 am

gimpilatorRe: Yeah..good stuff.

gimpilator

Hasn't voted

I'm glad you mentioned them. I thought about saying something about them in but decided against it to stay on topic. If anyone hasn't seen them, it's worth checking out. There are some nice volcanos worth climbing on Mars. Google Mars, Google Moon
Posted Dec 20, 2006 1:53 am

GerrySI Hate Google Earth

GerryS

Voted 9/10

With all the sleep it's cost me ... almost as bad as SP.
Resolution of the Maroon Bells is tremendous.
Posted Dec 20, 2006 5:32 am

Viewing: 1-20 of 43 « PREV 1 2 3 NEXT »