Selkirk Range > Gypsy Peak > CommentsGypsy Peak Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|
| Fred Spicker | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Well done page, great Getting There details, nice photos - boring mountain. | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2003 8:24 am | ||
| Martin Cash | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Well written. I've never seen the mountain in the summer. Only 1 foot lower is Mount Abercrombie, which looks like it has a fun snow climb via the east face in winter. I'm convinced there is some good technical rock on some of those peaks up there. Perhaps the Ridge of Gypsy you mention. Also, the north face of Hooknose Mountain looks promising. Nice photos. | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2003 10:26 am | ||
| Bob Bolton | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice job on this, Paul. Dean and I were up there the very next weekend after you. He had done the HPs of Ferry and Stevens counties the day before (Copper Butte and Abercrombie Mountain). I had already done those last year. Abercrombie is one foot lower, but has much more topographic prominence than Gypsy, being one of Washington's 5,000-foot+ prominence peaks. Here's a discussion on prominence. | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2003 10:09 pm | ||
| Dean | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Well done. You've covered all the bases very nicely. This is an interesting area of the state of washington and I thank county highpointing for bringing it to my attention. | |
| Posted Aug 28, 2003 10:44 pm | ||
| rpc | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page on an interesting peak. | |
| Posted Sep 17, 2003 8:43 pm | ||
| Brian Jenkins | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Just may have to bag this one on one of my trips to Spokane someday. | |
| Posted Dec 14, 2003 8:33 pm | ||
|