tlogan - Jan 27, 2005 5:06 pm - Voted 10/10
two thingsFirstly... unless this is a copyrighted photo can't imagine what someone was smoking when they gave this one three stars.
Second for only just over 1000m that is one hell of an impressive mountain... puts many three, four even five times it size to shame, at least from an aesthetic perspective. Great Shot!
harrymunk - Mar 24, 2005 9:31 am - Hasn't voted
Re: two thingsGlad you like the pic - scotland can be impressive on a good day! bear in mind that the sea is in the background so it pops up straight from sea level. if you like that one check out:
http://jim.audioshot.net
Proterra - Jan 21, 2006 2:04 pm - Voted 10/10
Should be the signature photoShould be the signature photo
desainme - Jan 21, 2006 10:23 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Should be the signature photoI agree it makes a good signature photo, but I decided to deploy it as a big clickable picture at the top of the page.
Proterra - Jan 22, 2006 5:41 am - Voted 10/10
Re: Should be the signature photoLooks good!
ferdinandverboom - Jul 30, 2011 7:57 am - Hasn't voted
impressiveThis is indeed an impressive mountain for it's size. It looks a bit similar to the Elk Mountains in Colorado.
Comments
Post a Comment