Kane - Apr 29, 2003 8:26 pm - Hasn't voted
What's Up with the 2 star votes!Why are SP members voting these North Twin Cone photos 2 stars? These images are from a digital camera and couldn't be better. I know why, and it sucks to think that only photos of prominent mountains will work for SP. These are easily 4 star photos of a very non technical mountain. If you read the overview you will find out why this mountain belongs on SP, the page is excellent. If you have mountaineering tunnelvision please don't vote.
Martin Cash - Apr 29, 2003 9:25 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: What's Up with the 2 star votes!Beats me. I like it Kane. Just gave it 4. You're right, they are nice and clear.
Dave K - Apr 29, 2003 10:19 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: What's Up with the 2 star votes!Kaner, I think you're on to something. A half-way decent shot of a prominent, sexy mountain will automatically get 4 stars, whereas an excellent picture of a less sexy mountain will get 2 stars.
I gave this one 4 stars, too.
tlogan - Apr 30, 2003 12:05 am - Hasn't voted
Re: What's Up with the 2 star votes!Great shot, I don't even need to read the page to know why it is included... the picture says it all! Two stars is ludicrous.
Jerry L - Apr 30, 2003 2:56 am - Hasn't voted
Re: What's Up with the 2 star votes!A Kenzo photo gets three stars and my dog on the summit gets 1 star. Go figure ? I mean a dog on a mountain, 1 star ?
kletterwebbi - May 16, 2003 1:21 am - Hasn't voted
Re: What's Up with the 2 star votes!It's a 4 star one ...
And I agree, the page is a very nice addendum of SP...
Comments
Post a Comment