Nice to see another Montana Mountain. Good Job.
Good page! Why don't you attach all the pictures to any of the sections? Makes the page look better. Cheers Gangolf
I agree with Gangolf. Also appears to be a problem with the name 8'906' ? Thanks for posting Montana mountain.
Done, except I ran into a problem. The main ridge route, which is Necessary for the getting there section since it IS the route, was inaccessible in the attach section of getting there, so I had to submit the photo twice. Is that bad?
Nice page.
Thanks!
Steven Cross - Mar 25, 2004 1:21 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice to see another Montana Mountain. Good Job.
Gangolf Haub - Mar 25, 2004 2:15 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page! Why don't you attach all the pictures to any of the sections? Makes the page look better.
Cheers
Gangolf
Jerry L - Mar 25, 2004 6:09 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentI agree with Gangolf. Also appears to be a problem with the name 8'906' ? Thanks for posting Montana mountain.
hgrapid - Mar 25, 2004 8:41 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentDone, except I ran into a problem. The main ridge route, which is Necessary for the getting there section since it IS the route, was inaccessible in the attach section of getting there, so I had to submit the photo twice. Is that bad?
BobSmith - May 22, 2004 6:46 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page.
hgrapid - Mar 23, 2005 1:39 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks!