| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Tatoosh Range > Unicorn Peak > Comments
|
| Fred Spicker | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page with concise information that tells us what we need to know. Suggestion - make the web sites "hyperlinks" - so we can just click on them. See FAQ #8 - it is really quite easy. | |
| Posted Sep 11, 2002 6:28 pm | ||
| Kane | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice work!! | |
| Posted Sep 12, 2002 8:23 pm | ||
| peakwolf | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page! It was really nice to see this page and all the great pics as I climbed this peak a long time ago when I lived in Seattle, but couldn't remember much about it. Thanks. | |
| Posted Oct 16, 2002 4:11 pm | ||
| rpc | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Excellent page! Nice route descriptions - looking at your photos, I think the route we did was a variation of 'the roof' - bypassed the roof to the right. | |
| Posted Oct 17, 2002 11:40 am | ||
 | ||
| cluck | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | care to sign the summit log? cluck | |
| Posted Oct 17, 2002 3:45 pm | ||
| ||
| rpc | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | ...actually did that already. thanks | |
| Posted Oct 18, 2002 1:19 pm | ||
| cjwhat | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | This is one of the best mt pages I've reviewed. You did misspell "junction". | |
| Posted Nov 6, 2002 3:49 pm | ||
| ||
| cluck | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Fixed the misspelling - thanks for the vote! | |
| Posted Nov 7, 2002 8:48 am | ||
| peak duster | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | great job! alot of useful info | |
| Posted Jun 21, 2004 6:32 pm | ||
| jtschanz | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page - lots of info. | |
| Posted Jul 12, 2004 12:02 pm | ||
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Excellent work! | |
| Posted Sep 9, 2004 10:59 pm | ||
| Brian Jenkins | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page. One of these days, I'll get around to ticking this one off. | |
| Posted Jan 22, 2005 2:00 am | ||
| Klenke | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | A vote for a note: the peak is actually 6971 ft. It appears you've transposed the numbers. Just an FYI. | |
| Posted Jul 9, 2005 2:30 am | ||
|
