| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
John Muir Wilderness > Mount Barnard > Comments
|
| OBIJUANKENOBI71 | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page! Cheers. Juan | |
| Posted Oct 31, 2002 12:34 am | ||
| Langenbacher | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page - I borrowed some "conditions" info. for my Birch Mtn. page. I'd definitely like to bag this "almost 14'er" | |
| Posted Nov 7, 2002 5:39 pm | ||
 | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks Lagenbacher! Feel free to use anything you like! | |
| Posted Nov 7, 2002 9:08 pm | ||
| Dean | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Another nice page. | |
| Posted Dec 18, 2002 6:52 pm | ||
| Aaron Johnson | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Text is descriptive and well written! | |
| Posted Dec 26, 2002 9:24 pm | ||
| gordonye | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | I recommend a different pic for the headline. | |
| Posted Aug 4, 2003 3:27 pm | ||
| ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Yeah, I agree. It’s a nice photo of my friend Mike, but not a very good photo of just the mountain. I’m hiking the High Sierra Trail in 3 weeks and I was planning to revisit Wallace Basin and take a few photos of Barnard. Hopefully I can get something more appropriate. | |
| Posted Aug 4, 2003 3:54 pm | ||
| ||
| gordonye | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | You can use someone else's picture of this mountain too. Just hover your mouse over it to get ID. | |
| Posted Aug 5, 2003 9:54 am | ||
| ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Done! I was in the area a month ago and took another shot of Barnard. Thanks for your input. | |
| Posted Sep 8, 2003 5:08 pm | ||
| Lara | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice writing. | |
| Posted Jan 21, 2004 3:07 pm | ||
| ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote and comment, LJ! | |
| Posted Jan 21, 2004 3:39 pm | ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Not so sure this is not a 14er by some measure. The U.S. Geodetic survey gives Mt. Whitney at 14505 which is 7-10 feet more than the geological survey. An extra 7 feet and a cairn- makes sense to me. | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2004 1:38 am | ||
| ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I'm 6-2--If I get a good, running jump, my finger tips can crack 14,000. Thanks for the vote! | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2004 9:41 am | ||
| wingding | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Wonderful job David! | |
| Posted Nov 29, 2004 8:02 pm | ||
| ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks Kathy for the vote! | |
| Posted Nov 29, 2004 8:46 pm | ||
| miztflip | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice work David. | |
| Posted Dec 9, 2004 10:43 pm | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for stopping by! | |
| Posted Dec 23, 2004 10:53 am | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote! | |
| Posted Dec 2, 2005 10:08 pm | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks again! | |
| Posted Dec 8, 2005 3:34 pm | ||
| physics | nice! | |
Voted 10/10 | this is an excellent page - all the information needed is there: distance to nearest trail head, list of the technical routes, and references on where to find more information on them. seriously, good job - I wish all mountain pages of "lesser popular" peaks were like this | |
| Posted May 29, 2007 2:58 pm | ||
|
