| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | There is some good information and a pretty picture, but parts of the page are a bit thin. More pictures and more information in the "Overview" section would improve the page. What makes the peak interesting? Is it particularly pretty (it looks pretty)? High? Historically important? In other words, why should someone be interested in climbing it? Please let me know if you make any changes. | |
| Posted Apr 1, 2003 2:05 pm | ||
| Scott | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 2/10 | Looks like a good page. More details would be nice. Update: Not bad, but no signs of improvement. | |
| Posted May 10, 2004 9:49 pm | ||
| Corax | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 9/10 | Quite thin on info, but with nice photos. No signature photo. Is the maintainer active? Knock-knock! | |
| Posted Aug 23, 2005 1:00 pm | ||
| Lolli | Adopted? | |
Voted 8/10 | I don't like this, that one cannot see former maintainers anymore! The present maintainer has voted a 2 on the page, is that right? Shouldn't it be removed? The page is short, but the info needed, is there. | |
| Posted Mar 20, 2006 11:09 pm | ||
|
