| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Lost Creek Wilderness > Tarryall Massif > Comments
|
| Aaron Johnson | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Kane has done a superb job representing the Lost Creek Wilderness on SP. This is a well done page. Excellent work from SP's Lost Creek ambassador. | |
| Posted May 15, 2003 3:18 pm | ||
| mpbro | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Another nice page from a cool area. Noticed that the peak is not named in the USGS database. Luckily, the "Lake Park" area is. I believe (from the 11403' elevation you gave) that the coordinates are 39.1766 -105.4236 Check the Topozone map and tell me if this is incorrect. -Morgan | |
| Posted May 15, 2003 3:46 pm | ||
 | ||
| Kane | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Morgan, you always come through with the Long/Lat for me. Yes, you found it. Thanks. | |
| Posted May 15, 2003 5:07 pm | ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page of a obvious very interesting area. | |
| Posted May 16, 2003 1:15 am | ||
| Andy | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Another great page Kane. I think you have a good opportunity here to isolate the apostrophes problem. In the fourth sentence in the Retirement Range Overview section you successfully use an apostrophe in Roach's. However, in the last sentence of the Retirement Range Overview section you get that funny character in the word you're. You might try copying whatever you did in Roach's and paste that over the other places where there are apostrophes. | |
| Posted May 16, 2003 6:38 am | ||
| nader | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page. I always wondered if there was a link between Kenosha Pass and Kenosha Wisconsin. Thanks for the info. | |
| Posted May 16, 2003 6:46 am | ||
| Alan Ellis | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Very good page! This area is worth looking into. BTW....why haven't you signed any summit logs? Alan | |
| Posted May 16, 2003 7:39 am | ||
| Grant | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great Page, Kane. What's next for this wonderful range. | |
| Posted May 16, 2003 9:20 am | ||
| JonBradford | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Kane, Nice expansion of the page formerly known as the "Lake Park Peak" page. I added some photos that I thought might help. One bit of critique, the "retirement range" section is a bit unwieldy, (although I must admit I never liked Mr. Roach's amalgamated moniker for three named ranges). Since the McCurdy Massif and the Tarryall Massif fall within the named Tarryall Range why not just address it as the Tarryalls? Wouldn't that be better then describing the northern Tarryalls in conjuntion with the southern Kenoshas? Just a though. Good page though. I am anxious to see it when it is finished. Jon | |
| Posted Dec 12, 2003 10:16 pm | ||
| ||
| Kane | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Jon, thanks for the vote, I have quite a ways to go before its done, but I will let you know. I'm not sure I know what you're saying. I thought the Tarryall Range was an obvious 2 section range. I guess Bison all the way north to North Tarryall could be the northern Tarryall's. Shit, I'm confused. I don't want to call it The Tarryall's because I would have to add McCurdy Mountain to this page and I think McCurdy deserves its own page. That's why I was going to make MCurdy Mountain/Massif the foundation of the page and later add stuff from McCurdy Park, making it the McCurdy Mountain/Massif. | |
| Posted Dec 12, 2003 10:28 pm | ||
| ||
| JonBradford | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Kane, Sorry for causing consternation. My point was that in the section on the "retirement range" you talked about sections of the Kenoshas and the Tarryalls together... I would just describe the Tarryalls and dispense with any mention of the Roach's retirement range, since that entity is not mentioned on a map it is unwieldy. It makes perfect sense to break the Tarryalls up (actualy I think they could be broken quite easily into 4 bits; the North Tarryall/Topaz section, Bison Peak, McCurdy Massif, and Tarryall Massif) I think you are doing great. Hope you don't mind if I keep throwing photos you way. Jon | |
| Posted Dec 12, 2003 10:47 pm | ||
| truchas | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice. I would like to see more pictures on the front page. | |
| Posted Dec 13, 2003 12:40 am | ||
| ||
| JonBradford | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Abovetimberman, Kane is reworking his "Lake Park Page" to reflect a massif with several summits. He had many photos up and then he took them down (to reorganize I should think). Patience brother. Jon | |
| Posted Dec 13, 2003 1:37 am | ||
| ||
| Kane | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks T-man for the vote. It will be a few more weeks beforevthis one is completed but I will let yall know when it is. Right now I like it without the photos for it looks clean for all my editing. I will add photos when i have completed my writing. | |
| Posted Dec 13, 2003 7:05 pm | ||
| BobSmith | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page. Lots of good information. | |
| Posted Dec 19, 2003 8:36 pm | ||
| Jerry L | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good information with good links and photos. well done. | |
| Posted Jan 3, 2004 2:36 pm | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Very good page! While browsing through the "mountains" section of SP, I noticed that this page was out of order alphabetically. | |
| Posted Jan 6, 2004 12:36 pm | ||
| ||
| Kane | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the nice vote. Yea, I have no clue as to why this page and the "Catamount"page jumped to the top of the list. This page used to be Lake Park Peak and i changed it to its current name. But I didn't do anything to my Catamount page, strange. | |
| Posted Jan 6, 2004 8:28 pm | ||
| The Lower Marmot | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Another great one! | |
| Posted Jan 7, 2004 8:35 pm | ||
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good page, but please add a trip report. | |
| Posted Apr 18, 2004 9:05 pm | ||
|
