| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Nevada 2,000 ft Prominence Peaks > Mt. Grant > Comments
|
| Sharon | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Entertaining write-up! (as well as informative.) The headers were especially clever & eye-catching. | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 1:27 am | ||
 | ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks Sharon, glad you enjoy it! | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 3:11 pm | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Get your stars ---- Being Rated Excellent page - might be missing some pictures Gangolf | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 2:10 am | ||
| Jerry L | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page. I didn't understand the "Get Real" segment. It's amazing how many ways 9-11 has affected our lives. Thanks for posting. | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 6:19 am | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | The whole "SP Police" schtick is a bit of an inside thing for the heavily active folks here at SP. I added some helpful references to the section..... | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 12:32 pm | ||
| Grant | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | I had to check out this peak due to it's interesting name. Nice page to bad about the restrictions. | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 10:55 am | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Not a bad name, really ;-) | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 3:12 pm | ||
| Dean | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great to see this one. I look forward to more of your pics. 'This is one I'll get, one way or another. Update: Got it on June 22, 2008 ; ) | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 9:12 pm | ||
| bearbnz | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Oh, another of those snow-free desert peaks, ripe for an easy winter ascent! Wearin' white camo, were you? | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 9:45 pm | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Well, any photos of your epic? | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2004 11:25 pm | ||
| Steven Cross | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Creative. You did not write why this peak is off limits. I think this is important info that needs to be added | |
| Posted Feb 24, 2004 12:27 am | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Hmm.....the peak is off-limits because the military says so. I don't question exactly why. I thought the references to 9/11 security were adequate. What would you suggest? | |
| Posted Feb 24, 2004 12:39 am | ||
| ||
| Steven Cross | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | I don't think I read close enouph. I noticed that in the "get there" section you mentioned that the military owns the mountain. Good enouph. | |
| Posted Feb 24, 2004 1:58 am | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I don't beleive that you can see Charlston, due to some of the ridges in Esmeralda County. However, I am pretty sure that you can see the Kawich Range on a clear day. The view to the north is quite extensive, but usually tainted by poor air quality. If you got a day with no air flow from the west, I'm guessing you'd be able to see 170mi+ to the north. Thanks for the comments! | |
| Posted Mar 9, 2004 11:57 am | ||
| ||
| ScottyS | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | PS --- Say hi to cranky Joe Giomi down at Ace for me. | |
| Posted Mar 9, 2004 12:00 pm | ||
| John | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice touch on the section headings! | |
| Posted Apr 12, 2004 9:15 pm | ||
| Nelson | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Funny, creative, informative. Great page, thanks. | |
| Posted Apr 12, 2004 11:11 pm | ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Get while the getting is good. Well chosen peak 56 miles NNW of Boundary Peak. Any Bristlecone Pines? | |
| Posted Apr 13, 2004 7:16 pm | ||
|
