| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| nader | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Very nice page. | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 3:40 pm | ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good page with instructions about ursus. Nice to see peaks from the Madison range. About the elevation-I would think that USGS would be primary, but sometimes there are alpine guide boooks that have better elevations. Then there is the geodetic survey and I think they try to study all the lumps on the sphere and so sometimes their elevations differ a bit from USGS. They seem a bit like 19 century phrenologists. They study fewer peaks and points than USGS but do so more intensivley | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 3:47 pm | ||
 | ||
| bakcast | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, Still working on this thing. Just added the signature photo and tried to change the long to negative but it doesn't want to show up on the page after I edit. I don't quite understand the Lat/Long data to be quite truthful, where is best to get this data from? How do you decipher what it should actually be? | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 4:07 pm | ||
| ||
| bakcast | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I found your notes one one of the pics. I think I figured out the lat/long using topozone. Thanks again The USGS quad states that the elevation is 11202, topozone says 11212. are there any written/unwritten rules pertaining to which one to use? | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 4:30 pm | ||
| ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Above any summitpost topozone, there is a big button called GET MAPS. If you push that button it will summon up a page where in you can write your target. Some times it proposes several areas, one of which may be what you want and sometimes it's a dud. In your case there appears to be but one Imp Peak and that is in its database. That's a cheap way to get longitude and latiude. If you get your desired area, you can mouse the summit and it gives it to you quite accurately..perhaps as accurate as a Tomahawk on a Bagdad Ministry. | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 6:49 pm | ||
| Brian Jenkins | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | I dig it. | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2004 6:04 pm | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page. Why don't you insert more of the pictures into the text? Gangolf | |
| Posted Feb 26, 2004 9:01 am | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | This is a very fine page! | |
| Posted Feb 26, 2004 12:38 pm | ||
| Jerry L | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Very nice page. I've done some climbing in this area and love it. I may be out there in the next several weeks. Thanks for posting. | |
| Posted Feb 26, 2004 5:43 pm | ||
| Alan Ellis | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Great page. Thanks for your support regarding the issue with scexplorer. Alan | |
| Posted Mar 27, 2004 7:13 pm | ||
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good page. I love Montana! | |
| Posted May 22, 2004 9:15 pm | ||
| Aaron Johnson | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice mountain. Well written. | |
| Posted Dec 20, 2004 11:22 pm | ||
| saintgrizzly | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good photos, good info--Nice page! | |
| Posted Feb 25, 2005 8:11 pm | ||
|
