| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Wasatch Range (Central) > Honeycomb Cliffs > Comments
|
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | This is stretching things too far! four pages on one day! Suppose you heard about our clubhouse (1000pt club) and decided you wanted to be with the crowd! Nicely done - all of them. Gangolf | |
| Posted Jul 23, 2004 4:27 am | ||
| mtwashingtonmonroe | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Another good one! | |
| Posted Jul 23, 2004 12:43 pm | ||
| Moogie737 | Which peak is the higher? | |
Hasn't voted | Do we have any official information as to which of the peaks is "the higher"? One would assume that the survey marker might carry some weight in the matter, but one could be wrong, too. | |
| Posted Sep 14, 2006 8:23 pm | ||
 | ||
| Scott | Re: Which peak is the higher? | |
Voted 10/10 | Actually the NW peak is higher. Assuming the contours are correct it would have to be between 10480-10520 feet high versus 10479 for one with the benchmark. Interpolated (closest method), the summit would be written as 10500. By clean prominence, it would be written as 10480+. Either way, the unmarked peak is highest. | |
| Posted Sep 14, 2006 9:33 pm | ||
| ||
| PellucidWombat | Re: Which peak is the higher? | |
Hasn't voted | Just make sure to climb both, then there is no uncertainty! :-D | |
| Posted Sep 14, 2006 10:14 pm | ||
| ||
| Moogie737 | Re: Which peak is the higher? | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks very much for the additional insight. | |
| Posted Sep 15, 2006 3:50 pm | ||
|
