SummitPost - Mont Tremblant -- Climbing, Hiking & Mountaineering -- Comments

FOR

MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking!

Areas & Ranges·Mountains & Rocks·Routes·Images·Articles·Trip Reports·Gear·Other·People·Plans & Partners·What's New·Forum

Mont Tremblant Comments

[ Post a Comment ]

Viewing: 1-18 of 18

sisyphus

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

2 stars for a good start. Hopefully you have photos that you'll add later. Many folks put an "Under Construction" at the top of the page if they aren't finished.

I did Spring Break here in 1999. It's a really charming area.

A few errors:

- Mont Tremblant isn't rated #1 in North America...just eastern North America. The folks at Vail and Whistler would be shocked!

- There are a bunch of spelling errors. Try cutting and pasting into word to fix them.

- The camping info needs real data. Give us a phone number to rangers, and other info that would help if someone wanted to camp.

- A route page would help. Right now we don't know how to get up there!

Good start. I'll up my vote when I see the improvements I'm sure are coming.

Posted May 4, 2005 3:27 pm


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	Pictures are up.
		Posted May 27, 2005 8:38 pm

William Marler

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

My comments would echo those made before. I will see If I can find some images. Good start. keep it up. Cheers William

Posted May 4, 2005 4:17 pm

bigwilly

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

Good start, I'll up my vote when it gets better.

Posted May 4, 2005 11:01 pm


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	Pictures are up.
		Posted May 27, 2005 8:36 pm

Andinistaloco

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

When I was setting up a page I had no clue how to tell folks it wasn't done. Still, good start here. Let me know when you finish it and I'll up the vote.....

Posted May 5, 2005 6:41 am


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	Pictures are up.
		Posted May 27, 2005 8:36 pm

desainme

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

Good deal. I talked to a Canadian Gov't guy today and he stuck by the

968 m but as you say the ski folks say 871 m when you talk to them

looking forward to the pix.

Posted May 5, 2005 3:59 pm


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	It is interesting about the elevation, i did not have my gps with me, i forgot it. I did get the elevation right off the hiking trail map made by the ski area and had no reason to question it, but now i will. as for the corddinates i found them on a website, it is a shame that topozone does not cover our canadian brothers in the north.
		Posted May 5, 2005 9:14 pm


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	The elevation is 968. The house that I stayed at is owned by a friend of the family. he has a GPS and has taken it to the top. He told me that it is 968m. Pictures are up.
		Posted May 27, 2005 8:35 pm


	desainme	Untitled Comment
	Voted 10/10	Thanks for checking out the altitude. Looks like you had some serious fog up there, but you made it!
		Posted May 27, 2005 8:59 pm


	Rob A	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	It was not much fog, the clouds were low, about 700 m. I was thinking about the elevation, I think the ski area would want as much vertical as they can have, so when they meet other ski ares they can whip out their "elevations" so they can compare size. Oh well the bigger the better.
		Posted May 29, 2005 11:02 pm