| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Yosemite National Park > Mount Gibbs > Comments
|
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 9/10 | Welcome to SP! The page is getting better, but route information must be improved, along with more precise information on how to reach the trailhead. | |
| Posted Jul 28, 2005 1:57 pm | ||
| Dave K | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice job! | |
| Posted Jul 28, 2005 10:50 pm | ||
| Matthew Holliman | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Looks good! | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2005 12:04 am | ||
| keema | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Getting there. The overview could be improved, a little more description, type of rock etc. There are routes up the west and south ridges also. All my maps show the elevation as 12,773 ft. Check out Bob Burd's site for the etymology of the name. | |
| Posted Aug 4, 2005 10:24 am | ||
 | ||
| HenneB | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Hi Keema, RJ Secor lists two elevations, 12773 and 12764. I then consulted National Geographic's Topo, which listed it as 12764 as well. However, the SierraClub has it at 12773. So I went back to Secor and found out that two listings refer to the new and old listing (that is all he says). So the evidence leans toward 12773 and I have changed the site accordingly. Henrich | |
| Posted Aug 18, 2005 7:20 pm | ||
| pinch | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | You've got a lot of useful information here. The photos are gorgeous. I like how you integrated some photos into the route description. But isn't the elevation wrong? As others have asked, isn't the elevation 12773? Let me know if that is incorrect. | |
| Posted Aug 7, 2005 6:40 pm | ||
| ||
| keema | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Thanks, I think, for the compliment on the route page. I did that one. dan | |
| Posted Aug 7, 2005 6:56 pm | ||
| ||
| HenneB | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Hi Pinch, RJ Secor lists two elevations, 12773 and 12764. I then consulted National Geographic's Topo, which listed it as 12764 as well. However, the SierraClub has it at 12773. So I went back to Secor and found out that two listings refer to the new and old listing (that is all he says). So the evidence leans toward 12773 and I have changed the site accordingly. Henrich | |
| Posted Aug 18, 2005 7:19 pm | ||
|
