| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Big Horn Range > Bighorn Peak > Comments
|
 | ||
| keenez01 | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I agree that I do need a route page. I have mentioned a few of the routes in passing. However, you are right. I should take the time to describe several of the routes in detail. Thanks! Zach | |
| Posted Jul 30, 2005 12:18 am | ||
| saintgrizzly | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page, but your photos seem rather consistently too dark and muted in color. Is this by your choice, or camera/editing problems? Anyway--good to have the peak on SP. | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2005 12:43 am | ||
| ||
| keenez01 | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thank you for taking the time to look at my page as well as your constructive criticism. I have always had an affinity towards darker photos. Maybe it’s the light and dark contrast or the fact that I think I can see the lines in the picture better I don’t know. You are not the only one to comment on this so I think I will experiment with Photoshop a little bit and see if I can light a few of the shots. Thanks again! Zach | |
| Posted Jul 30, 2005 12:15 am | ||
| William Marler | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page. I sent you an email about your images. They are nice shots just a bit dark. Cheers William | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2005 10:15 am | ||
| BCL | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Looks good. | |
| Posted Jul 29, 2005 12:02 pm | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good page - I curious why the Range isn't named by it's highest peak - or what's so special about Bighorn that the range is named after it | |
| Posted Jul 31, 2005 3:58 pm | ||
|
