SummitPost - Guadalupe Rock -- Climbing, Hiking & Mountaineering -- Comments

FOR

MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking!

Areas & Ranges·Mountains & Rocks·Routes·Images·Articles·Trip Reports·Gear·Other·People·Plans & Partners·What's New·Forum

Guadalupe Rock Comments

[ Post a Comment ]

Viewing: 1-18 of 18

IdahoKid

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

Good page but this mountain is on private property and I believe that is against SP policy....anyone care to chime in and correct me?

Edit: 4-stars

Posted Nov 6, 2005 4:21 pm


	McCannster	Untitled Comment
	Voted 10/10	I don't believe there is such a policy. Just look at Mt. Umunhum, or Loma Prieta. There are a bunch of others I've come across too.
		Posted Nov 6, 2005 4:44 pm


	McCannster	Untitled Comment
	Voted 10/10	Sorry, bad link. Loma Prieta.
		Posted Nov 6, 2005 4:46 pm


	Rad Thibidauoxx	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	its still a summit even though its on private property. i know the point of sp is to post accesible mountains but i dont think its a big deal a couple of unaccesible mountains get posted because they're still cool to check out even if your not planning to go to them. im never planning on going to silver peak but its still a cool page to look at. wether or not its on private property is irrelevant.
		Posted Nov 6, 2005 4:56 pm


	truchas	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	There was a discussion and some controversy a while back and the concensus afterwards was that peaks on private property are ok to submit.
		Posted Nov 7, 2005 1:31 am

2skinners

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

Good page!!

Posted Nov 8, 2005 3:36 am

Bob Burd

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

btw, I would suggest changing the name to simply Ganja Rock, leaving the UN 1062 out of it (clutters it up). You can mention in the first paragraph that its an unofficial name. Locally used names are fine and used in numerous places elsewhere.

If you feel bold, Mt. Day could use a nice page as well. It's a pretty long effort to get there, but one of the more enjoyable adventures I've found in the Bay Area. And it's on private property which should put it high on yours and David's list. :-)

Posted Nov 9, 2005 10:49 am


	Rad Thibidauoxx	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	thanks for the vote. me and david have already once attempted mt day but got caught before we could make it there. im sure there will be another attempt soon though because david is a bit of a fanatic about mt day.
		Posted Nov 9, 2005 11:08 am


	Bob Burd	Untitled Comment
	Voted 10/10	It took me three tries to finally make it to Mt. Day. If you don't mind a bit more work, you can approach from Joseph Grant like we did, and only have a small stretch near the top where you need to worry about the landowners. Let me know if you need/want any additional beta, like a map. Sometimes of course, part of the fun is finding these things out on your own. :-)
		Posted Nov 9, 2005 6:39 pm


	Rad Thibidauoxx	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	sounds good but thats probably something you'd rather take up with david. he's really into navigating and maps, much more than i am anyway.
		Posted Nov 9, 2005 7:35 pm


	Al Pine	Untitled Comment
	Voted 10/10	Mt. Day? Cool. I never hear of anyone going up there. Should be a Black Mountain page as well.
		Posted Nov 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Al Pine

Untitled Comment

Voted 10/10

great page, but you really should consider the fact that it is currently illegal. It may cause a larger amount of people to go into the area, and potentially mean that restrictions are tightened.

Posted Nov 26, 2005 9:26 pm


	Rad Thibidauoxx	Untitled Comment
	Hasn't voted	Read the "Red Tape" section. I clearly state that it is illegal. Did you even read my page before you voted?
		Posted Nov 27, 2005 12:16 pm