| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Longfellow Mountains > The Crockers > Comments
|
| CharlesD | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Nice, Puma. Good to see more Maine mountains here. With the NH 4000ers fully covered, Maine has been falling sadly behind. Three stars 'cause, hey, no photos. Other than that, great stuff. | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 9:45 am | ||
 | ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks ... I figured 3 stars was the best I could hope for with no pics yet. | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 12:25 pm | ||
| Rob A | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Good solid info. | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 9:49 am | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, Rob. I thought of that ... how do I do that? | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 10:01 am | ||
| ||
| Rob A | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | When you edit a page, the last thing before the overview box say's groups. There is a drop down menu and scearch for ME Appalachain Trail Peaks on the list. | |
| Posted Nov 16, 2005 9:58 am | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Done ... and yes I am a moron! | |
| Posted Nov 16, 2005 11:22 am | ||
| William Marler | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | My comments would be the same as the others. Needs some photos. Good start. | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 10:44 am | ||
| nartreb | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Solid info, just needs photos. | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 12:59 pm | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for all your help in page building nartreb. Got one photo up ... it's a start. | |
| Posted Nov 17, 2005 9:47 pm | ||
| charles | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | it´d be agreat to see a photo of what this looks like. Cheers Charles | |
| Posted Nov 15, 2005 4:19 pm | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I've got one photo up if you're interested in seeing what the mountain looks like. Thanks for the vote. | |
| Posted Nov 17, 2005 9:48 pm | ||
| ||
| charles | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | ok seen it and thanks! :o) | |
| Posted Nov 18, 2005 3:28 am | ||
| Johan Heersink | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Info is good, but the page does need at least some pictures. | |
| Posted Nov 16, 2005 6:35 am | ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Might help to get a few more pix. | |
| Posted Nov 17, 2005 6:52 pm | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote ... much appreciated. | |
| Posted Nov 17, 2005 9:46 pm | ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote, Rad. Hopefully, more pictures will be added in the not too distant future. | |
| Posted Dec 9, 2005 7:04 pm | ||
| climber46 | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | You may want to correct the height of Crocker Mtn. The North Peak is 4168 feet and the South Peak is 4010 feet according to my maps and guidebooks. | |
| Posted Jan 11, 2006 4:12 pm | ||
| ||
| Catamount | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote. Also note, the heights of many peaks in this region were adjusted by the 1999 USGS survey that bumped Spaulding and Reddington above 4000 as well. I have the new heights listed. You are right ... it was 4168. I should note, however, that I am a hypocrite ... I have Sugarloaf listed as 4237 though it's new height is 4250. The 4237 figure is widely repeated as the height of this popular mountain so I went with the inaccuracy. | |
| Posted Jan 11, 2006 10:09 pm | ||
|
