| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| Moni | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Looking good! | |
| Posted Jan 3, 2006 10:01 pm | ||
| JonBradford | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Neat. I am not nearly old enough to know the name... but my father is 76 and he made me listen to many old radio programs and eight tracks. Nice looking mountains and a well written page. Jon | |
| Posted Jan 3, 2006 10:25 pm | ||
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Hmm, Interesting opening, but beyond that a really strong page. Good work! | |
| Posted Jan 3, 2006 11:21 pm | ||
 | ||
| Klenke | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I aim to displease. Thanks for stopping by...and wasting your time on the rest of my aimless Amos page. | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 11:44 am | ||
| desainme | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Politically correct? | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 12:05 am | ||
| ||
| Klenke | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | No. Apolitically incorrect. | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 11:45 am | ||
| gjagiels | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice! | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 1:18 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Now your faible for statistics made you learn tables! A faible for tables, hehe. But somehow I'm puzzled by the approximate 103rd and 118th highest summits. Why approximate? Does that imply that the statistics might be wrong? Someone forgot to count a summit? Or two? Damn! | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 3:07 am | ||
| ||
| Klenke | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | It depends on the rules used for counting and the rules used for various reported heights for it and other peaks. Since you can't please all the peakbaggers all the time, you have to please them some of the time...by making approximating statements. | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 11:43 am | ||
| Dean | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Now I'm waiting for you to put up Laurel and Hardy Peaks. | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 9:15 am | ||
| ||
| Klenke | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | There's a Laurel Mountain in Oregon (2kP, GPP, and Cohp of Polk County). Seems like there's got to be a peaklet nearby that would be Hardy. Although, it would have to be pudgy peaklet, wouldn't it? | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 11:41 am | ||
| Super Dave | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice page, enjoyed the witticism (or something like that). | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 3:26 pm | ||
| Lee Stamm | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice job, as always, Paul. | |
| Posted Jan 4, 2006 3:36 pm | ||
|
