| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| Tbacon251 | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Needs some pic's brother. | |
| Posted Jan 30, 2006 6:23 am | ||
| Catamount | Not bad | |
Voted 10/10 | Much improved from the first time I looked at this page. You don't really need the Topozone link in the text as you can click on it on the toolbar on the left (you have the lat and long correct so the Topozone is correct). For the Papa Bear link, you should make it active (insert link in the edit mode). You have one active link on the page so obviously you know how to do this. A little more information wouldn't hurt. | |
| Posted Jun 11, 2006 5:13 pm | ||
 | ||
| Catamount | Re: lack of info | |
Voted 10/10 | Definitely a fine looking peak ... particularly for its size. And I don't think anyone familiar with NE hiking questions your level of knowledge. :-) Anyway, I bumped up my vote. | |
| Posted Jun 16, 2006 6:49 pm | ||
| desainme | Perhaps | |
Voted 10/10 | You can take a camera next time? | |
| Posted Jun 14, 2006 12:26 am | ||
| Amicus | Moxie Mountain | |
Hasn't voted | Nice write-up of an underappreciated mountain. I bushwhacked up there in September 2007, with buckyball1 and Big Moose (not members here, I believe). They too are working on the "prominence" lists to which Roy alludes. We came in from the NE and followed that slide, like some others before us. We had a foggy day - bad for photos. I took a few anyway, including one of the slide and another that shows that summit platform - http://amicus.smugmug.com/gallery/4218920_yKVDh#246697940_UBC5d (I don't know how to make that URL clickable, if that can be done in a Comment, but you can paste it into your browser if you're curious.) | |
| Posted Sep 29, 2008 1:46 pm | ||
|
