| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| livioz | If you lowers.. | |
Hasn't voted | the width of the extended pano from 800px to 790px, probably the horizontal sliding bar at the bottom of the entire text disappears. The vertical sliding bar present with some browsers (i.e. Opera) cannot be eliminated also increasing the height. In the same manner, the percentage option proposed by gabriele doesn't work with all the browsers and can upset the page. Edit: Forgot to point out that the horizontal sliding bar is present only when the screen width is limited to 1024 px. | |
| Posted Feb 14, 2006 11:02 pm | ||
 | ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: If you lowers.. | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, I must explore this issue and learn a bit. | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 9:42 am | ||
| vvujisic | Beautiful Rosennock! | |
Voted 10/10 | Congratulations Vid for your first page on SPv2! Beautiful page of Rosennock peak! It must be fine to climb it in the winter. Pozdrav, Vlado | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 12:13 am | ||
| tiziana | Nice page | |
Voted 9/10 | Vid and interesting layout :) | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 4:47 am | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: Nice page | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, Tiziana! I was sending all members, who voted 10/10 this same message: "Thanks for visiting and voting my Rosennock page! But, please be realistic. This is just perhaps a bit above average page, we have so many better pages, and the grade 10/10 should be reserved for really the best ones. So, try to calibrate yourself and please reconsider your vote, perhaps in the range between 6/10 and 8/10." You were also too generous :-) Cheers! Vid | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 9:36 am | ||
| cjaniesch | Complete Page | |
Voted 9/10 | To me this looks like a complete page of your usual quality. I think it should score 10/10. Why don´t you attach all photos so we could see the Rosennock image gallery? | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 7:29 am | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: Complete Page | |
Hasn't voted | I think that even if the summit is completely covered by the page (and Rosennock is not!), that does not justify the grade 10/10. Great page is a great subject too, and Rosennock is only a moderately interesting mountain. Why not attaching all pictures? Don't know. Perhaps you're right. I thought it was enough if they are on the page. But I thint I'll do that. Thanks! | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 9:39 am | ||
| ||
| cjaniesch | Re: Complete Page | |
Voted 9/10 | Well we see things differently then. When I vote I just vote on the page itself not on the submitted mountain (compared to Everest Rosennock could otherwise only score 1 or 2 out of 10). But you are probably right in so far that one should be more careful with distributing 10/10. | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 9:59 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Two suggestions | |
Voted 8/10 | Put the pano in a table with {table class=thumb}. This gives you the same frame that you have around the other images. The code for the enlargement icon is somewhat more difficult. Look at the source code of the pictures if you want to see how it works. Anyway I did this for the Cimon panos (grumble) The medium picture in the overview should be centered. I would actually like it the way it is but at my screen resolution the heading of the next section (Getting There) is placed beside the image. And that looks mighty strange (the text is already below the image. Using centered images you get an automatic linebreak. Not sure why I vote 8 stars - it seems to have replaced the four stars | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 10:42 am | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: Two suggestions | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, Gangolf! Regarding voting - I wrote to all, who rated Rosennock page 10/10 the following memo: "Thanks for visiting and voting my page! But, please be realistic. This is just perhaps a bit above average page, we have so many better pages, and the grade 10/10 should be reserved for really the best ones. So, try to calibrate yourself and please reconsider your vote, perhaps in the range between 6/10 and 8/10." Josh and some others really did lower their votes and that's fine with me. Regarding you 2 proposals - I did something with the second one and did not succeed with pano. Must take some time. Only today I can see source code of pages. Cheers! | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 4:44 pm | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: I like | |
Hasn't voted | Lorenzo, I was sincere. A page of a small, less important summit, even if perfectly described, still does not deserve 10/10. It's not fair to the pages such as: Everest, Aconcagua, Eiger, or some group-page 'encyclopedias'. I did this page in less than 2 hours. | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 4:24 pm | ||
| ||
| lorenzo t | Re: I like | |
Voted 10/10 | It is not the name of a mountain, or some group-page 'encyclopedias' that renders beautiful one page. L. | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 6:39 pm | ||
| Lolli | Good page! | |
Voted 8/10 | I agree with Vid, actually. There is the opportunity now to reserve 9 and 10 for those extra-ordinary pages & photos. I thought I'd keep 7 as some kind of "normal, good" page and 8 for those who are slighty above that - like this page. Problem is maybe, that one just abstain from voting on the less good ones. | |
| Posted Feb 15, 2006 11:05 pm | ||
| 2skinners | Nice | |
Voted 8/10 | Nice page!! -2skinners- | |
| Posted Feb 18, 2006 1:03 am | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: Nice | |
Hasn't voted | :-) | |
| Posted Feb 18, 2006 7:57 pm | ||
| dedo | Good! | |
Voted 8/10 | Nice page, Vid. Originally I voted 10, just to realize later, that you don't want more than 8, so be you will. :-) I appreciate the incredible amount of work you put into all your pages, the info, those maps...very well! | |
| Posted Feb 18, 2006 7:19 pm | ||
| ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Re: Good! | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks! We are all having big troubles voting on the new SP. But it's important that we see each others' stuff. I'll soon finish my 'Nock' posting. One more, perhaps. | |
| Posted Feb 18, 2006 7:57 pm | ||
| ||
| dedo | Re: Good! | |
Voted 8/10 | Hehe...funny note about the 'Nock posting'. You did an amazing amount of mountaineering here, Vid. I guess, the voting will need some time, especially to get used to vote less than full score on good pages. It's a pity the comments are separated from voting now, as I think the comments are what drives this community (yours motivated me to submit more mountains, for example). | |
| Posted Feb 18, 2006 9:10 pm | ||
|
