| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
Front Range (CO) > Twin Cones > Comments
|
 | ||
| kalet | Re: Under construction. | |
Hasn't voted | I no longer see this option. | |
| Posted Feb 21, 2006 12:28 am | ||
| 2skinners | Voting now instead of later | |
Voted 7/10 | I am voting now so that you can message me when this page is done so I can upgrade my vote. The information here is actually pretty good for still being under construction. It could use a profile picture though, but you probably already thought of that. Just message me when you are finished and I will adjust my vote. -2skinners- | |
| Posted Feb 22, 2006 10:12 am | ||
| John Climber | Good start | |
Voted 8/10 | A little bit short. I see good photos. Do you have more? Good links. Maybe information about good campgrounds, tracks from other sides of the mountain, ...etc. | |
| Posted Feb 23, 2006 11:01 pm | ||
| ||
| kalet | Re: Good start | |
Hasn't voted | I've added text to the Overview, Getting There, Red Tape and Camping Sections. I've also added another photo. I don't have many from this trip. In the Overview section I've added info about the north side of the Twin Cones bordering Winter Park Ski Resort, which is why I don't discuss routes from the north. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Thanks! | |
| Posted Feb 24, 2006 1:25 am | ||
| ||
| John Climber | Re: Good start | |
Voted 8/10 | kalet, one of the things that I like from SP is that, in these cases, the making of a better page motivates me to hike again in the area to take more picks, do another routes,...I even phone some instances to find out someting I am missing....Am I crazy? | |
| Posted Feb 24, 2006 9:45 pm | ||
| ||
| kalet | Re: Good start | |
Hasn't voted | I've added another photo. I would not recommend any other routes to the Twin Cones. Coming from the north while Winter Park Resort is open is illegal. Coming from the north while it is closed would not be enjoyable due to the chairlifts. | |
| Posted Feb 27, 2006 6:24 pm | ||
| John Climber | Ok | |
Voted 8/10 | kalet, always good to see you are working on a page!! Thanks for informing. I did rate as an 8 now. | |
| Posted Feb 27, 2006 7:05 pm | ||
| RyanS | route page? | |
Voted 8/10 | I agree that the page is still a little thin. Looks like you chose to include the route information on the main page instead of on a route page. How come? Add a route page with a more fully realized route description, and I'll up my vote. | |
| Posted Mar 3, 2006 10:26 pm | ||
| ||
| kalet | Re: route page? | |
Hasn't voted | I decided to include the route information on the main page instead of a route page because I like to see annotated topos on the main page so I can more efficiently browse SP. I've added the First Creek route because it is not covered in any text. Feel free to let me know what else I can do to improve the page. | |
| Posted Mar 6, 2006 5:22 pm | ||
|
