| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| hgrapid | Nice page, but... | |
Voted 9/10 | This is a good, complete page as usual, but do you really need a route page for a couple sentences? Why not put it on the main page? Also, is there any more description you can add? I am pretty sure you will probably be beefing up this page since it is new, but I just happened to catch it now, so I am making these suggestions. Same issue with Big Pryor Mountain where you have a four line route page. Regards. | |
| Posted Aug 24, 2007 4:22 pm | ||
| T Sharp | I disagree; | |
Voted 6/10 | This is not a good, nor is it a complete page, again you are telling me there is nothing worthwhile to write about Mount Edith? You should delete this page and let someone who cares write about it. I will check back and lower my vote if it is not improved. | |
| Posted Sep 25, 2007 1:45 am | ||
 | ||
| streeyyr | Re: I disagree; | |
Hasn't voted | If you have some interesting facts and figures on Mount Edith, or more noteworthy information, then why don't you list that in the additions and corrections column? I could then incorporate that info into the page. I did a google search of Mount Edith, and nothing of any consequence came up. If the google search would've revealed some good information, I would have included that into the page. Same with the other mountains you critiqued. | |
| Posted Sep 26, 2007 4:05 pm | ||
|
