| Welcome to SP! - Sign-In | Register | ||
| | |
| MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking! | ||
|
| Andino | Excellent work... | |
Voted 10/10 | Dan ! | |
| Posted Oct 19, 2007 2:55 pm | ||
 | ||
| Nanuls | Re: Excellent work... | |
Hasn't voted | merci Antoine! | |
| Posted Oct 21, 2007 2:42 pm | ||
| Klenke | Hewitts List needs prominence column | |
Voted 10/10 | I like the page, but why not include the prominences for the Hewitts (the first list on the page) as well, in a separate column? Maybe the prominence isn't known for all of them. But it could be included for those that are known. I think I know, but what exactly is "re-ascent"? | |
| Posted Oct 23, 2007 2:12 am | ||
| ||
| Nanuls | Re: Hewitts List needs prominence column | |
Hasn't voted | Hi there thanks for your interest. I do know the prominance of these mountains, and I could include it. The reason I didn't is because I've made a similar list for Wales and didn't know the prominance of them, so for continuities sake I left them out of th English list. If I find the prominance of the Welsh mountains I'll go back and change everything, what do you think? Re-ascent is really just another word for prominance, but only applies when you have two or more summits as part of the same mountain. For example, Y Lliwedd in Wales has two summits of roughly the same height. The prminance of the highest summit is around 200m, and the re-acent that would be needed to visit the second summit is around 20m. I think thats clearish... Cheers Dan | |
| Posted Oct 23, 2007 4:32 am | ||
| Mountain Impulse | Nice Job | |
Voted 10/10 | Clear criteria and great layout. Augie from California | |
| Posted Oct 23, 2007 2:35 pm | ||
| ||
| Nanuls | Re: Nice Job | |
Hasn't voted | Cheers Augie! Much appreciated Dan | |
| Posted Oct 24, 2007 5:24 am | ||
|
