Welcome to SP!  -   
 
 MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking!
Areas & Ranges·Mountains & Rocks·Routes·Images·Articles·Trip Reports·Gear·Other·People·Plans & Partners·What's New·Forum

 Forums Home > Taxonomy Planning > Thread

How about a S Calif. Forum vs. an N Calif Forum?

[ Start New Topic | Reply to This Topic ] All times are GMT  
 Author Topic: How about a S Calif. Forum vs. an N Calif Forum?
hikin_jim


Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 33


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 10:34 pm GMT  Quote
 
Sometimes, there are a lot of posts to go through in the Calif section. How about a S Calif. Forum vs. an N Calif. Forum?
Hyadventure


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 154


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:44 am GMT  Quote
 
It is a big and diverse state..
Woodzy


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 186


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:53 am GMT  Quote
 
hikin_jim wrote:
Sometimes, there are a lot of posts to go through in the Calif section. How about a S Calif. Forum vs. an N Calif. Forum?


YES!
MichaelJ


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 957


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:22 am GMT  Quote
 
I think the majority of the posts in the California forum deal with the Sierra, which defy a north-south dichotomy. And as someone who travels a lot between north and south, I find it easier to go to a single forum rather than two. Also, it's interesting that I don't recognize any of the three people supporting this idea as anyone I've ever seen posting in the California forum. If you don't have much to contribute to a single forum, how much would you have to add to a bifurcated one?
MoapaPk


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 4357


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:31 pm GMT  Quote
 
Coming from the land of the Southwest (AZ, NM, NV, UT, TX) forum, I say... boo-hoo! Very Happy
Woodzy


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 186


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:58 am GMT  Quote
 
MichaelJ wrote:
I think the majority of the posts in the California forum deal with the Sierra, which defy a north-south dichotomy. And as someone who travels a lot between north and south, I find it easier to go to a single forum rather than two. Also, it's interesting that I don't recognize any of the three people supporting this idea as anyone I've ever seen posting in the California forum. If you don't have much to contribute to a single forum, how much would you have to add to a bifurcated one?


Well I post a fair amount. I think it would be nice though.... Becuase I always want to check and see whats going on locally in SoCal. In this instance, it would be nice to have seperate ones.
JedSMG


Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 78


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:15 pm GMT  Quote
 
I'm far from a regular contributor, but how about splitting the California Forum into Sierra and Non-Sierra?
fatdad


Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 826


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:48 pm GMT  Quote
 
While I think everyone agrees that it's a big state, you're bound to get some hair splitting. Sure questions about Shasta or San Gorgonio are going to be easy to distinguisy. But if I ask a question about the Bishop area, is that No Cal or So Cal? How about climbing at the Needles?

Nice in theory; a little trickier in practice.
KathyW


Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 1341


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:20 pm GMT  Quote
 
Please leave California together. For those who want So Cal info there are San Gabriel, San Gorgonio, San Jacinto....forums out there.
brianhughes


Joined: 18 Dec 2003
Posts: 710


[ Profile | PM ]
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:30 pm GMT  Quote
 
JedSMG wrote:
I'm far from a regular contributor, but how about splitting the California Forum into Sierra and Non-Sierra?


Better yet, how about "Sierra" and "Sierras" ??
Display posts from previous:   
[ Start New Topic | Reply to This Topic ]


 
Jump to:  




© 2006 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.