by sidhayes » Mon May 24, 2010 11:43 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue May 25, 2010 12:12 am
by Diego Sahagún » Tue May 25, 2010 12:17 am
by butitsadryheat » Tue May 25, 2010 12:37 am
jspeigl wrote:But most of the $120,000 expedition total is coming out of Team Romero's life savings.
by jspeigl » Tue May 25, 2010 1:31 am
butitsadryheat wrote:Outside Magazine wrote:But most of the $120,000 expedition total is coming out of Team Romero's life savings.
How does a 13 year old have $120,000 in life savings?!?
by MoapaPk » Tue May 25, 2010 2:15 am
by sidhayes » Tue May 25, 2010 2:58 am
by Marmaduke » Tue May 25, 2010 3:30 am
sidhayes wrote:It is all illogical. The people want to climb Mt. Everest only because it is the highest on earth. But they bring it down to a much lesser altitude peak by carrying the drug making it not 29000 feet. But then some people cry and say that without the drug they could not do it. And I say so what and that one is cheating by using it. I cannot run a 3:45 mile, but do I decide to put on some rocket pack that permits me to do it. No! Same thing with Everest. Most people do not have the plumbing to do it on their own (without the drug cannisters) and therein lies the beauty of the mountain. It's summit should be trod only by those elite climbers who have the will and altitude capability to do it. This is logical. The summit is not for everyone just as the sub 4 minute mile. Why degrade it?
by GEM Trail » Tue May 25, 2010 5:02 am
sidhayes wrote:...he used bottled oxygen for his ascent, making it thus not the highest mountain in the world, but one far lesser...next time please make the ascent "by fair means"
by visentin » Tue May 25, 2010 8:09 am
by Cy Kaicener » Tue May 25, 2010 8:56 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests