by nartreb » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:25 pm
by mrchad9 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:53 pm
by Vid Pogachnik » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:11 pm
by Bob Sihler » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:05 pm
by Bruno » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:46 pm
Vid Pogachnik wrote:Many good suggestions above. What I'd like to add is that what should really be valued and honoured on SP is how mountain, route, area etc. pages are being updated, maintained. How the owner manages to cooperate with other members. There are great examples of this, but there are also many members who attempt to attract attention only posting new pages and never updating them. How many of you are doing the tedious job of adding less important pieces of information on existing pages, being aware that rarely anybody will notice that? But we also have visitors who come on SP, search for let's say Aconcagua, and then it's very important do they find the version from 2002 od from 2010. Luckilly we can be proud of Aconcagua page...
by chugach mtn boy » Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:54 pm
Bruno_Tibet wrote:Risk. Some members in desesperate need of advertisement might be tempted to correct a couple of typos every week in order to have their submissions appearing in the list, but if they are happy so...
by Bruno » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:23 pm
chugach mtn boy wrote:Bruno_Tibet wrote:Risk. Some members in desesperate need of advertisement might be tempted to correct a couple of typos every week in order to have their submissions appearing in the list, but if they are happy so...
Not a trivial problem. I make tiny corrections in my pages whenever they occur to me. I wouldn't want them popping up every time on a "recently updated" list, with people like Bruno thinking I was just "in desperate need" of attention. So I'd probably avoid making the little tweaks. If this feature submitting the page to a "recently updated" list was automatic, it could end up being counterproductive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests