Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

Climber's Log etiquette

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
 

Climber's Log etiquette

Postby SJ » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:18 pm

What's the general consensus on adding a climber's log to your profile page if you didn't summit? I know it has a check box for a successful summit, but who really goes in and looks at that. I always thought of it as a bit of a cop out, but there are a lot of peaks I've been on where I've been close to summiting then had to turn back. My ego wants me to add these to my page, but until now I've held off.

Maybe I just shouldn't care so much about notching my belt, but hey what can I say. This is like Facebook for climbing.
User Avatar
SJ

 
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:57 pm
Location: Santa Monica, California, United States
Thanked: 4 times in 3 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby rebelgrizz » Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:50 pm

I don't sign a climber's log unless I summit....but thats just me...
User Avatar
rebelgrizz

 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:13 pm
Location: Whitefish, Montana, United States
Thanked: 11 times in 7 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby GlacierCountry » Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:03 pm

Climber's log vs Summit log??? I view the climber's log as a way to journal what mountains have been climbed. Whether I made it to the summit or not is more of a personal benchmark or goal, and that I believe, is why the check mark option is there. If I climb 3000 feet but have to skip the last 100 because of some obstacle I personally don't believe that negates the effort put forth and the experience I gained on that particular mountain. In that situation I would sign the log but not check the "successful" button. For me this is just a record keeping journal, a way to keep track of where I've been.
Mountains and Music
User Avatar
GlacierCountry

 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Kalispell, Montana, United States
Thanked: 7 times in 7 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby MoapaPk » Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:31 pm

Some of the best beta comes from unsuccessful attempts; usually those entries are longer and more informative.
User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7610
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Thanked: 739 times in 477 posts

The following user would like to thank MoapaPk for this post
awilsondc, Josh Lewis, Kiefer

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby Vitaliy M. » Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:49 pm

I do not log in any peaks I do not complete my goal on. For example if my goal is to summit Mt. X and climb NW arete route on it I would not log in Mt. X summit log if I got in a thunderstorm just bellow the summit, but I would check off the route page if I completed it. If there is a rock climb on some face I usually check the location as well as the route. For example I would check El Cap if I climbed E buttress route and didn't continue to the true summit. Just my thing.
User Avatar
Vitaliy M.

 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:23 am
Location: San Francisco, California, United States
Thanked: 287 times in 215 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby Josh Lewis » Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:31 pm

I've had way cooler attempts on many mountains that "successful" summits. An example, I could have done what my friend Gimpilator did when he climbed Shuksan via the Sulphide Glacier, but I wanted to do a more challenging route even though I knew there was a much lesser chance of me making it up on the Fisher Chimneys. So I think after the epic trip I still at least deserve the honors of signing the climbers log for saying "I tried, it was intense, and had the time of my life". 8)
My Websites: Alpine Josh · Alpine Ascent · AceMaps
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, The Cloudiest Place on Earth, United States
Thanked: 472 times in 323 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby mrchad9 » Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:46 pm

Since there is a checkbox option, I think it is proper to do whatever you like with respect to signing the log. Just don't say you climbed the peak unless you did the whole thing, including the summit block, or make any comment misleading or imply otherwise. That said, I personally do not sign the log unless I made the summit, just my own preference.

I think a seperate item would be to have a feature so users could identify on the profile pages which items were summitted and which were not, probably easy to do. However, given no work is being done on the site performance/speed, which is a much more important issue, I wouldn't expect any changes here.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4178
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1202 times in 814 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby Josh Lewis » Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:18 pm

I agree with Mr. Chad, it would be cool to have a section for "My Attempts". I personally have no shame in showing off my attempt list. 8) Although Matt is very skilled with what he does here with sp, I know he is a very busy guy, so perhaps if we had another site maintainer (excluding elfs) that would be good for sp. :wink:
My Websites: Alpine Josh · Alpine Ascent · AceMaps
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, The Cloudiest Place on Earth, United States
Thanked: 472 times in 323 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby nartreb » Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:35 pm

Does anybody actually feel strongly about somebody else's summit/attempt list?

I look at log lists on profile pages when somebody asks a question (say, about gear) in the forum; it helps me judge whether they know enough to know what they really need to ask.

I haven't met a lot of partners through SP, but I certainly would look at someone's summit list before signing up to a big or technical objective. If they only have one or two comparables, I'd read the log to see things like what time of year it was and (if they provide the info) what conditions they encountered, how long it took them, and how hard it felt to them. If they've got dozens, I'm not going to check how many are listed as DNFs. I just assume that not everybody summits every time, and it's more than OK with me if my partner knows how to turn around.
User Avatar
nartreb

 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: online or in boston, Massachusetts, United States
Thanked: 106 times in 87 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby Kiefer » Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:41 pm

I gotta agree with MoapaPk. I'll usually sign a log for a mountain if I attempt it (getting at least the Lion's share of the route done) but won't check the box if it wasn't successful.
I've used others' unsuccessful beta so much on a pletheria of peaks.
Hell, I think my overall success rate is somewhere around 50% for everything I've done/attempted.

Having current beta on Peak-A or Peak-B whether or not someone has successfully summited benefits the community as a whole and I for one, appreciate it when others sign in.
So thanks folks!
User Avatar
Kiefer

 
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Estes Park, Colorado, United States
Thanked: 116 times in 65 posts

The following user would like to thank Kiefer for this post
Josh Lewis

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby JHH60 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:31 am

So if someone climbs Liberty RIdge on Rainier, tops out at 14,200' after 7000 vertical feet of alpine ice climbing, and (as most people seem to do) doesn't bother to take the techncially trivial detour over to Columbia Crest, but instead heads down the Emmons Glacier, would you not give them credit for successfully climbing Mt. Rainier?
User Avatar
JHH60

 
Posts: 1154
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Belmont, California, United States
Thanked: 87 times in 73 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby PellucidWombat » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:58 am

I sign the summit log for failed attempts (using the checkbox appropriately, of course), and just state in the message that I failed, and usually the reason why. I figured that's good enough and can be informative for other parties.

JHH60 wrote:So if someone climbs Liberty RIdge on Rainier, tops out at 14,200' after 7000 vertical feet of alpine ice climbing, and (as most people seem to do) doesn't bother to take the techncially trivial detour over to Columbia Crest, but instead heads down the Emmons Glacier, would you not give them credit for successfully climbing Mt. Rainier?


You just described my last 2 climbs on Mt Rainier :-D Although at this point since I've already been to the proper summit, I care less about the summit than completing a route, though visiting the summit is always nice.
User Avatar
PellucidWombat

 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: Berkeley, California, United States
Thanked: 48 times in 34 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby mrchad9 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:27 am

JHH60 wrote:So if someone climbs Liberty RIdge on Rainier, tops out at 14,200' after 7000 vertical feet of alpine ice climbing, and (as most people seem to do) doesn't bother to take the techncially trivial detour over to Columbia Crest, but instead heads down the Emmons Glacier, would you not give them credit for successfully climbing Mt. Rainier?

Of course not.

If you don't stand on the highest point, then you didn't climb Mt. Rainier. The individual would have (argueably) successfully completed the Liberty Ridge route however.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4178
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1202 times in 814 posts

Re: Climber's Log etiquette

Postby JHH60 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:27 am

mrchad9 wrote:
JHH60 wrote:So if someone climbs Liberty RIdge on Rainier, tops out at 14,200' after 7000 vertical feet of alpine ice climbing, and (as most people seem to do) doesn't bother to take the techncially trivial detour over to Columbia Crest, but instead heads down the Emmons Glacier, would you not give them credit for successfully climbing Mt. Rainier?

Of course not.

If you don't stand on the highest point, then you didn't climb Mt. Rainier. The individual would have (argueably) successfully completed the Liberty Ridge route however.


It's all so very confusing. Someone who has climbed Liberty Ridge has (arguably) demonstrated much more competent climbing skills than someone who has walked up the DC route. But perhaps they haven't demonstrated summiting skills. So I suppose someone who climbs the Nose but doesn't walk to the high point of El Capitan afterwards can't claim to have successfully climbed El Cap, whereas someone who hikes up to it via the Yosemite Falls route can. It would be so much easier if the Elves changed the name from "Climber's Log" to "Summiter's Log".
User Avatar
JHH60

 
Posts: 1154
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Belmont, California, United States
Thanked: 87 times in 73 posts

Next

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.