by lcarreau » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:40 am
by haivanhuynh » Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:01 am
by mvs » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:03 am
battledome wrote:I think it depends. Some people start out middle class... and then they become climbers and drop a socio-economic rung or two.
by CClaude » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:28 pm
by kheegster » Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:59 pm
by Augie Medina » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:02 pm
by Dow Williams » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:22 pm
kheegster wrote:To be honest, while I can someone dirtbagging as a sport or even trad climber, alpine climbing is much more gear-intensive (a good -20 deg bag = rack + rope), and difficult alpine-style climbs totally trashes gear.
I'm already dumping my income straight into gear, and I'm not sure I'd be able to do any alpine if I were to end up flipping burgers.
by fatdad » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:34 pm
by CClaude » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:39 pm
Mountain Impulse wrote:Just my guess that high disposable income is more of a factor (a requiste) for activities like high altitude mountaineering. I imagine Himalayan outings cost a pretty penny, not only in terms of out-of-pocket for travel and gear, but also the equivalent in time; unless you're in the renown/elite class where you have sponsors.
Users browsing this forum: nartreb and 0 guests