Kane wrote:Bob Sihler wrote:Matt Lemke wrote:Danm...sorry Woodie...I didn't realize you were working on the Emerald/Iowa Pages. I am about to finish those.
As for the San Juan Range page...I am working very hard on that page. If anyone has any input the'd like to give please let me know. I really want that one to be fantastic.
Sneffels page is done
Matt, good work on Emerald and Iowa. I agree with Sarah that separate pages would be in order, but if you feel the single page is better, please consider adding "Emerald Peak" and "Iowa Peak" to the query names. Currently, if you enter either peak name in the search engine, you don't get your page.
Thanks to all for restoring pages and to Sarah for making this thread to keep track of things.
If anyone has a URL for a deleted page, I might be able to get the page restored. Climber logs would still be lost, but there wouldn't be broken links on area and list pages anymore. Of course, I'd strip all text before handing the page over.
Matt, I'm for keeping your Emerald & Iowa page, one page and call it "Emerald Peak" to satify the Search engines, with another section on the page for the lesser mountain "Iowa Peak." Nobody goes out for Iowa Peak only. Its an afterthought after one researches the more stately Emerald Peak. Just my .2
I changed the query name...lol I did the first time
Had to go back just for Emerald!
I apologize for the delay on my part recently...school has been rough last week but this week will be much better. I was recently also informed
that AJ didn't want any of his original text left in pages. I was confused about what all his requests were but I did notice he said he was deleting all his photos so I re-arranged all the photos for the page.
I never realized he wanted all the text deleted and re-done. I'll get on that this week and my apologies to Aaron for not being tuned in to the whole situation.
)
