Josh Lewis wrote:If you read the other 20 pages, you would know that that is not going to happen.
Josh, you should finish High School young man before you tell me what I need to do. Mind your business and stay out of mine. Are we clear?
by Deltaoperator17 » Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:00 am
Josh Lewis wrote:If you read the other 20 pages, you would know that that is not going to happen.
by Josh Lewis » Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:12 am
by lcarreau » Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:19 am
by sierramtngoat » Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:34 am
by mrchad9 » Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:47 am
sierramtngoat wrote:The only real issue I have with mountain 'ownership' is that a user is allowed to delete it after dependencies have been established; this action causes summit log entries to vanish and creates broken links on list pages. There should be a policy added that once a peak is either on a list, has a route, or a summit log has been signed (any dependency really), then the owner should not be able to delete the mountain entirely; perhaps deleting his content would be acceptable, but not to the extent that the record for the peak has been deleted. 'delete my page' (or whatever the feature is) could wipe the page and set the peak to an 'up for grabs' status. Perhaps there can be a link users can click on that will show orphaned peaks? Also, if it is possible to adopt a peak, a snapshot should be made at the moment of adoption so that the peak can be restored to something if the new owner decides to be malicious and delete the peak that he/she adopted.
by mvs » Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:13 am
by Marmaduke » Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:07 am
by mrchad9 » Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:27 am
mvs wrote:What I was getting at with my "asinine" (thanks mrchad9) comment about it being impossible to change voting behavior was that for years we've complained about the way people vote. None of these complaints change things one bit. We've essentially got a "thumbs up/thumbs down" system, despite numerous essays from individual members describing their nuanced voting patterns. I think the behavior is somehow emergent in the system, possibly because it's hard to tell the relationship between a vote and the page score. Whatever.
mvs wrote:I hoped this thread wouldn't become another place to chew that old bone.
by mvs » Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:12 am
mrchad9 wrote:mvs wrote:I hoped this thread wouldn't become another place to chew that old bone.
Well... you were the one who brought it up!
by Sarah Simon » Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:25 pm
by mvs » Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:39 pm
by vanman798 » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:33 am
by mrchad9 » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:40 am
vanman798 wrote:Wiki is a bad idea, as we risk to many changes and potential bad info.
by Bob Sihler » Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:30 pm
by MoapaPk » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests