by butitsadryheat » Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am
by Bob Burd » Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:12 am
butitsadryheat wrote:doesn't everyone have a strong desire to escape Bakersfield?
by butitsadryheat » Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:38 pm
by butitsadryheat » Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:49 pm
SeanReedy wrote:I'd guess that without maintenance and improvement of California's extensive water system, flooding of areas shown on that map would be more common, but it is actually a simulation of an extreme weather scenario similar to the storms of 1861-62. http://www.wunderground.com/blog/weatherhistorian/article.html?entrynum=13
The story about taking a canoe from Bakersfield to the bay is interesting. That wouldn't be my first choice of adventures, but it sounds like an adventure nevertheless and would beat walking, especially under flood conditions. He must have had a strong desire to escape Bakersfield.
by colinr » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:55 pm
by butitsadryheat » Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:25 am
by markv » Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:43 pm
by colinr » Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:38 pm
markv wrote:It's my understanding that the petitioned proposal would not require a new, magical water resource. The main water source would still be the same drainage, just recaptured in different ways and below Hetch Hetchy Valley. Am i understanding wrong?
by shoenberg3 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:10 pm
by spreck » Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:52 am
by ElGreco » Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:48 pm
by colinr » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:41 pm
Users browsing this forum: Scott M. and 0 guests