Front Page

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: Front Page

by mrchad9 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:40 pm

I have no issue at all with your trip reports. Just do not think that trip reports should be selected based on who flatters the mods the most.

And hopefully it isn't.

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: Front Page

by Bob Sihler » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:55 pm

mrchad9 wrote:I have no issue at all with your trip reports. Just do not think that trip reports should be selected based on who flatters the mods the most.

And hopefully it isn't.


Every time I have filled in for one of the "front page maintainers," I have featured the pages of people who have most recently made flattering comments to my submissions.




(not really)
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Thanked: 1108 times in 677 posts

Re: Front Page

by Josh Lewis » Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:08 pm

Looks like I'm an exception to this then. I got featured on one of my pages and didn't post a single comment on Bob's content lately. :wink: (It's nothing against you Bob, I just been too busy these days climbing mountains more than I been at home)

How do we know Mr. Chad isn't using his psychology and is saying that so that his recent page he made gets featured. :lol:

User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: Front Page

by mrchad9 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:13 pm

Josh Lewis wrote:How do we know Mr. Chad isn't using his psychology and is saying that so that his recent page he made gets featured. :lol:

You don't know that, but those who select the pages here know me well enough to know that isn't what I am doing.

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Front Page

by lcarreau » Sat Aug 06, 2011 3:37 am

The downside of attempting to achieve fame on a website is 20/20 hindsight that the intended audience will find DELIGHT in discovering the same insane LIGHT on youtube .. ... try saying that really fast!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUF-Rqi1mbA[/youtube]
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: Front Page

by Bob Sihler » Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:11 pm

Lionel wrote:Earlier today I saw a front page TR about a trip in the Inyo Mountains, did that disappear?


The owner apparently deleted the page and then posted a redone version: http://www.summitpost.org/a-love-affair-with-the-inyos-a-double-traverse/735443.
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Front Page

by lcarreau » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:08 am

The Truth ? The TRUTH ???

"You can't handle the darn TRUTH ...!"

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Dow Williams

 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 1:59 pm
Thanked: 219 times in 101 posts

Re: Front Page

by Dow Williams » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:14 am

you are only mocking Matt's inability to inovate the site, meanwhile losing/not attracking N. American "climber" (folks who actually climb and yes there is such a thing on the "internets" (sic)) contributors and users not too mention so many folks who were willing to contribute at one time or another...

User Avatar
chugach mtn boy

 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 7:54 pm
Thanked: 224 times in 129 posts

Re: Front Page

by chugach mtn boy » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:13 pm

Dow Williams wrote:you are only mocking Matt's inability to inovate the site, meanwhile losing/not attracking N. American "climber" (folks who actually climb and yes there is such a thing on the "internets" (sic)) contributors and users not too mention so many folks who were willing to contribute at one time or another...

The nice thing about SP is that it caters to a variety of interests, including former climbers, wannabe climbers, never-gonna-be climbers, and general mountain lovers. Also, that it's not all about "N. American."

Dow, it would be a shame to lose you, but you could move your content over to your own site. Then you could be featured, not just more often than anybody else, but every single day! You'd be cronies with the owner!

User Avatar
Dow Williams

 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 1:59 pm
Thanked: 219 times in 101 posts

Re: Front Page

by Dow Williams » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:49 pm

Summitpost is my site of choice for storing and displaying my content, no worries. Folks use my beta here everyday, thus the 6 million hits, etc. The issue I have with the front page is not that my work should be featured, as I stated in the OP as though you really took the time to read it, I realize most folks who peruse the internet and this site do not climb at the level I am climbing. In other words most of the stuff I climb is not mainstream. My work is found and thus utilized via Google (specific beta search), not through SP and thus does not need to be featured.

However, this site could be and should be much more dynamic in attracting not just new contributors whose work could randomly show up on the front page versus being selected via chronyism, but just as important, more users (readers) of beta/content. Right now most folks who visit SP see a bunch of garbage on the front page and move on.

Lets take a look at Gangolf's latest since his contributions are always featured. They were last week, they are this week, they were the week before...whenever I look, there is some obscure German/Euro walk featured. But today's selection is such an example of why there are no dynamics, no new blood, even while old valued contributing members continue to leave. Gangolf adds the page that is featured this week, prob been featured several times, who knows, who cares. It is a climbing crag yet he does not climb. It is akin to some youngster (not many mature adults would even do same) adding City of Rocks to SP even though they don't climb. Adding a climbing contribution to SP when you have not personally climbed at the location has always been frowned upon and if it was a new member, he/she would get hounded. Gangolf? he gets 80 confirmations of what a great job he did. Seriously? that is why there are no real climbers from Germany adding content. No first person beta. Last I checked this site was suppose to be something different than wikipedia. Obviously it is not.

As for my content, I use summitpost more than summitpost uses me. It serves my purpose well. My only gripe is when I look at the rest of the site outside of my own work, it falls well short of what it could be and is stale and seems to be dying a slow death in terms of real participation from new folks, whilst losing quality climbing/real sport members, with zero innovation to curb same. Old fashioned cronyism, patting each other on the back and telling each others all so sensitive ears what they want to hear will not change that. Only real change I know comes from effort and work versus bullshit patronism.

User Avatar
mvs

 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 7:44 pm
Thanked: 307 times in 123 posts

Re: Front Page

by mvs » Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:08 pm

The reason the site doesn't have a lot of contributors from Germany is that the site isn't in German, it's in English. Same for French and Italian. Not because Gangolf wrote his article about the Südpfalz. I understand you want to put overwhelming force behind your arguments, but c'mon.

Still, like you, I'd like to see the site be more friendly for technical climbing. At times I've argued for a wiki approach...because according to my theory, there are many more thousands who want to just write up a little bit about what they know, and not to meet the super-high standards set for mountains and routes. But at least one of the poor, left-out, taken-for-granted North American "real" climbers you allude to was horrified at that idea, as were many others. So we've been having these kinds of conversations but just haven't found a consensus. You don't seem to have any problem making excellent pages either.

This is actually a really complex problem, and trying to address it by picking on Gangolf won't solve anything. I guess you imagine a horde of real climbers waiting in the wings but too discouraged to contribute because of the contents of the front page...which they are monitoring for cronyism, euro-bias, anti-climber bias and all the other accusations you make. I doubt this contingent of people are real.

User Avatar
Dow Williams

 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 1:59 pm
Thanked: 219 times in 101 posts

Re: Front Page

by Dow Williams » Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:46 pm

mvs wrote: I guess you imagine a horde of real climbers waiting in the wings but too discouraged to contribute because of the contents of the front page...which they are monitoring for cronyism, euro-bias, anti-climber bias and all the other accusations you make. I doubt this contingent of people are real.


Does not do the site any great service in attracting new blood, maintaining valued members...and yes....if SP membership condoned folks adding, particularly non-climbers, climbing based content/beta for the areas I climb, I would not be interested in contributing. I definitely would not want my first person/first hand climbing contributions floating around with observations from folks who have not climbed the objective.

If the site was designed to be more dynamic and random=interesting, it would go a long way of eliminating the items you state above and maybe real sport enthusiast participation would at least rise to some previous level if not surpass it.

You folks sure do rise to the occasion if some young new contributor adds content to which they have not climbed...but when one of your own, me or anyone for that matter, they should not be above the fray.

User Avatar
mvs

 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 7:44 pm
Thanked: 307 times in 123 posts

Re: Front Page

by mvs » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:47 pm

Dow, you are certainly free to criticize this page or any other, I just don't like the scattershot nature of the things you say. I'll argue with you on the point of this Südpfalz page because you have a specific point and maybe we can talk without throwing in too many side issues. (I'm going to ignore all the "you people"/"you folks" talk).

This particular area page is not pretending to know anything about the climbing routes in the area. It shows maps, talks about the country side, and lists summits and their elevations. It's actually talking about the area from the point of view of a hiker, and in reading it I don't see any attempts to usurp the role of a knowledgeable rock climber in that context.

Now, as a climber myself, would I like to see an area page that focuses on the climbing routes? Sure! For example I'd like to know the "5 star" climbs in a given subarea. Gangolf isn't going to be able to provide that, and he doesn't even try. He did NOT create "climbing based content/beta for the areas I climb" nor did he contaminate "first person/first hand climbing contributions" with "observations from folks who have not climbed the objective."

It's an area page, not a summit or a route page. It's written by someone who hiked around the area a lot. Aside from mentioning that it's popular with climbers, nothing this hiker did is so risible as you intimate.

Finally, did he obscure content from real climbers, by virtue of his enlightened position on the elf staff? No, he didn't commit that crime either.

I can attest from personal experience, that when Gangolf made an Area page for the Wilder Kaiser mountains, known for the technical climbing (as well as their hiking), he asked some climbers, me included to share ownership of the page in the hope we would contribute some good technical stuff. I imagine this Südpfalz page will go the same way. Somebody knowledgeable about the technical routes will eventually come along and you'll eventually see more of the kind of information you want to see about rope lengths, protection, raptor restrictions, whatever.

You are a highly productive individual on the site. Your contributions serve the technical climber, and very well at that. The hiker? Not so much. And that's fine.

I'll shut up now, the last word is yours :).

User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Thanked: 1108 times in 677 posts

Re: Front Page

by Josh Lewis » Mon Aug 08, 2011 9:06 pm

Dow Williams wrote:If the site was designed to be more dynamic and random=interesting, it would go a long way of eliminating the items you state above and maybe real sport enthusiast participation would at least rise to some previous level if not surpass it.


I gotta agree with you here Dow. 8)

PreviousNext

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests