Google uses Summitpost as a "bad example"

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
User Avatar
Hotoven

 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:06 pm
Thanked: 118 times in 89 posts

Re: Google uses Summitpost as a "bad example"

by Hotoven » Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:24 pm

goldenhopper wrote:very difficult to understand unless you are an elite class regular who already knows his/her way around a fine piece of machinery. :wink:


Are you just describing your play-mate? :D
"Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!"
- The Dude, Lebowski

User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 88 times in 58 posts

Re: Google uses Summitpost as a "bad example"

by visentin » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:47 pm

WouterB wrote:Just thought I'd share this. Had a Google training last week and in their presentation they actually use Summitpost as an example of how NOT to do it. Maybe if Matt has some time in the future... .


I feel sorry for Google, but thanks to educated people the web owns a wide range of content natures, from the almost empty pages that show only impressive graphics and presentations, to more sober ones that will repel all rubbernecks. Thanks to that perhaps there is less crap in Summitpost, most of our contributors are cultivated people and the value added is there.
Let SP be as it it... and don't worry about Google ;)
(besides of that, SP pages often come on top of Google mountain-related searches. Random ?)

Previous

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests