by Dow Williams » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:26 pm
by Andinistaloco » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:09 am
by snowey » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:14 am
by Dave Daly » Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:38 am
Dow Williams wrote:mp is much more climbing (read actual climbing) related...climbing photos, route of the day, latest news and climbing articles from the rags, etc....SP is more of a hiking/photog site with a few of us climbers littering up the place from time to time....both have good beta, but MP has more climbing contributers regarding actual routes, no question, helps if you want to read summit logs to check out conditions of the route, etc....but several of us here provide a better print ready beta (first account) format for the same routes....both are good visits if you are taking on a technical route with a bit of adventure to it....
by Guyzo » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:35 am
by thigbee » Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:14 am
by MichaelJ » Thu Feb 04, 2010 7:49 am
by yatsek » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:17 am
MichaelJ wrote:This site should actually probably call itself Slog Post. Nice pictures, though.
by mvs » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:52 am
MichaelJ wrote:Better climbers tend to hang out on MP, which is why it's easier for anyone with more time than skill to rack up points on SP, which is fine if that's what you're into but some may find the self-congratulatory beta sprayers a bit tiresome (sorry, your parents didn't love you). There are, of course, some good individual contributions from people who aren't always calling attention to how supposedly good their contributions are. Also, MP really does a more comprehensive job on most places from the Valley to Patagonia. This site should actually probably call itself Slog Post. Nice pictures, though.
by CClaude » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:23 pm
by SpiderSavage » Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:06 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests