Day Hiker wrote:

butitsadryheat wrote:

Iron Hiker wrote:

billisfree wrote:The sunset picture presented in the first post strongly appears to be Mt. Adams to me.





It's kinda hard to get a really sharp detailed topo pictures... because I need
to back off quite a distance, to make sure the provile is not deformed
by rendering the pictures too close.

Mt Adams has 3 "humps" while Rainier has two.

Plus a few other obvious features.

Remember light bends in the air and can sometimes create mirages... making
a mountain look taller than normal.

Nice observations.....but not quite correct, I think. Your 3D of Rainier is actually too close to the mountain - if you back it off more to better simulate how it looks from that far away in Oregon, Liberty Cap will come into view and thus serve as the "hump" on the right. Point Success, Columbia Crest, and Liberty Cap are the three humps seen on Rainier.

I'm trying to figure out how to post a Google Earth 3D shot of Rainier from the ESE from my computer on here....never done it before.

Ask Dayhiker. He can make/take a look at anywhere from any distance with his software, like he did for me on the last page, of Bakersfield looking NE. Pick a town where you'd want to view them from and he could prolly figger it out. It's awesome.

I generated images of both Adams and Rainier from the Pendleton/I84 location described in the photo caption. Foreground topography was omitted from the image generation for both because it is only the shapes of the silhouettes that we want to compare; we were not trying to determine if these peaks are in fact visible from Pendleton. Obviously something is visible because the photo exists.

Compare the shapes.



It's definitely Rainier.

It is interesting how Adams does a good job of fooling us by trying to mimic Rainier from this viewpoint. It's rather creepy, actually, like the thing from the movie The Thing.

But upon close inspection, the shape of Adams is definitely wrong.

Link to photo page: http://www.summitpost.org/view_object.php?object_id=340670

Just like I said you would Amazing. Cool software.

I'm way too fascinated by this topic...

I don't have time to fiddle with the line-of-sight software right now, but if anybody wants to plug it in, Denali is probably visible from the southernmost peaks in the Brooks Range, about 300 miles away. The mountains surrounding Coldfoot on the Dalton Highway for example are about 4000 feet high, and I may just have to hike up there within the next month or two to check it out (we get our clearest sky conditions this time of year usually).

On second look, maybe not. Though most of the line of sight passes over the Yukon and Tanana River flats, it also must crest a shoulder of moderately high mountains, a bit over halfway to Denali, right where it would accentuate the earth's curveture. Still I bet you could top 300 miles from somewhere in the Brooks Range, though the spot might be rather hard to get to.

meganerd wrote:I'm way too fascinated by this topic...

I don't have time to fiddle with the line-of-sight software right now, but if anybody wants to plug it in, Denali is probably visible from the southernmost peaks in the Brooks Range, about 300 miles away. The mountains surrounding Coldfoot on the Dalton Highway for example are about 4000 feet high, and I may just have to hike up there within the next month or two to check it out (we get our clearest sky conditions this time of year usually).

On second look, maybe not. Though most of the line of sight passes over the Yukon and Tanana River flats, it also must crest a shoulder of moderately high mountains, a bit over halfway to Denali, right where it would accentuate the earth's curveture. Still I bet you could top 300 miles from somewhere in the Brooks Range, though the spot might be rather hard to get to.

Probably not. Here's the Denali view: http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/pano ... nali-N.gif
There's no sign of the Brooks Range, since the mountains around the Yukon River seem to block it. Mount Blackburn in the Wrangells seems to be the farthest spot you can see at over 260 miles: http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/pano ... nali-S.gif.

By the way, heywhatsthat.com has bad data for Alaska, so don't try using it to confirm this. It will glitch out over 200 miles. But Viewfinder does an absolutely fantastic job - I just wish there would be more American panoramas.....

meganerd wrote:I'm way too fascinated by this topic...

I don't have time to fiddle with the line-of-sight software right now, but if anybody wants to plug it in, Denali is probably visible from the southernmost peaks in the Brooks Range, about 300 miles away. The mountains surrounding Coldfoot on the Dalton Highway for example are about 4000 feet high, and I may just have to hike up there within the next month or two to check it out (we get our clearest sky conditions this time of year usually).

On second look, maybe not. Though most of the line of sight passes over the Yukon and Tanana River flats, it also must crest a shoulder of moderately high mountains, a bit over halfway to Denali, right where it would accentuate the earth's curveture. Still I bet you could top 300 miles from somewhere in the Brooks Range, though the spot might be rather hard to get to.

Without creating a simulated view, it can be calculated that this view is not possible. Between a 20,000-foot peak and a 4,000-foot peak on the Earth, the farthest possible view is in the range of 250 miles, and that is if the terrain at the critical points between them is at sea level.

Denali and Foraker are clearly visible from sea level at the shore in Anchorage, when the weather is clear. That is a 133-mile view from sea level, which is pretty cool.

27 August 2005:

On the way back from the coast yesterday, I was able to see the Sierra from the intersection of Hwy 46 and Kecks road. I think I saw the Mineral King area, and the area north of that, possibly up to the Yosemite area (it was easy to see the snow capped peaks, but hard to identify any in particular), This had to be over (or around) 100 miles.
Day Hiker, can you run this through your software? It was ENE or NE of that intersection, west of Blackwells corner.

It was amazingly clear yesterday. I've often been able to see the Coast Ranges from the Sierra (100-130 miles away), but I think yeserday is the first time I've ever been able to see the entire valley floor as well. Usually it is just the Coast Ranges peaking over the haze.

butitsadryheat wrote:On the way back from the coast yesterday, I was able to see the Sierra from the intersection of Hwy 46 and Kecks road. I think I saw the Mineral King area, and the area north of that, possibly up to the Yosemite area (it was easy to see the snow capped peaks, but hard to identify any in particular), This had to be over (or around) 100 miles.
Day Hiker, can you run this through your software? It was ENE or NE of that intersection, west of Blackwells corner.

I've been kind of busy, so not too many labels, but here is an image. It's a 90-degree field of view, from due north to due east.

LOL at the big horizontal scroll . . .

From <a href=http://www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/397784/navajo-mountain-ut.html>Navajo Mountain, Utah</a>. Here is Humphreys Peak, located 125 miles to the south.



And Monument Valley, 42 miles to the east. I include this photo just because its so cool to see the features of Monument Valley so clearly, even though they are 42 miles away.


Both shots taken from the same spot at around 8000 feet. The summit itself doesn't have a view, but I climbed one of the radio towers at the summit and got a 360 degree view that probably stretched across both Utah and Arizona east-west.

Both photos taken by Alex Loomis.

Day Hiker wrote:

butitsadryheat wrote:On the way back from the coast yesterday, I was able to see the Sierra from the intersection of Hwy 46 and Kecks road. I think I saw the Mineral King area, and the area north of that, possibly up to the Yosemite area (it was easy to see the snow capped peaks, but hard to identify any in particular), This had to be over (or around) 100 miles.
Day Hiker, can you run this through your software? It was ENE or NE of that intersection, west of Blackwells corner.

I've been kind of busy, so not too many labels, but here is an image. It's a 90-degree field of view, from due north to due east.

LOL at the big horizontal scroll . . .

Thanks Day Hiker! I could see the area around Kaweah. I wish I could have seen Goethe, but it was covered in clouds that day. Incredible! That has to be well over 100 miles. In the Central Valley! In summer! Usually, I'd be lucky to see I-5 from that point!

when redneck and i were on baldy's summit last march, we could see charleston peak over in nevada. that was pretty cool.

there was something else farther off in the distance with snow on it that we couldn't figure out what it was. i was guessing humphreys over in az, but i just looked at the map and i think that's way too far.

MikeTX wrote:when redneck and i were on baldy's summit last march, we could see charleston peak over in nevada. that was pretty cool.

there was something else farther off in the distance with snow on it that we couldn't figure out what it was. i was guessing humphreys over in az, but i just looked at the map and i think that's way too far.

Yeah, wouldn't be Humphreys, way too far away. Was it in the direction of Humphreys from Baldy though (roughly ENE-ish)? Maybe could have been those mountains above Kingman, AZ (blanking on the name...Huavasupai or something like that?)

McCannster wrote:

MikeTX wrote:when redneck and i were on baldy's summit last march, we could see charleston peak over in nevada. that was pretty cool.

there was something else farther off in the distance with snow on it that we couldn't figure out what it was. i was guessing humphreys over in az, but i just looked at the map and i think that's way too far.

Yeah, wouldn't be Humphreys, way too far away. Was it in the direction of Humphreys from Baldy though (roughly ENE-ish)? Maybe could have been those mountains above Kingman, AZ (blanking on the name...Huavasupai or something like that?)

yeah, when looking at charleston peak from baldy, this other peak would've been south and further away.

Rainier seen from Prairie Peak between Corvallis and Florence, right about 200 miles.

calebEOC wrote:Rainier seen from Prairie Peak between Corvallis and Florence, right about 200 miles.

Pretty neat pic. I do think, however, that this is St. Helens standing out more since it's closer by 50 miles (149 miles away from Prairie), and seems to have that "right shape." Paradoxically, this view has Rainier and St. Helens NEXT to each other, but I cannot make out anything like Rainier to St. Helens' left (cloud interference). Nevertheless, if Rainier is visible, this would be one of the longest photo shots anywhere in the lower 48 that I've seen!

Iron Hiker wrote:

calebEOC wrote:Rainier seen from Prairie Peak between Corvallis and Florence, right about 200 miles.

Pretty neat pic. I do think, however, that this is St. Helens standing out more since it's closer by 50 miles (149 miles away from Prairie), and seems to have that "right shape." Paradoxically, this view has Rainier and St. Helens NEXT to each other, but I cannot make out anything like Rainier to St. Helens' left (cloud interference). Nevertheless, if Rainier is visible, this would be one of the longest photo shots anywhere in the lower 48 that I've seen!

When I first saw this I thought St Helens also, but it climbed so high into the sky I throught it more likely Rainier. It looked as high as Hood from where I was at thus my thinking it wasnt St Helens, but maybe your right.