by James_W » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:13 am
by James_W » Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:50 pm
by kakakiw » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:41 pm
KristoriaBlack wrote:Hey ya,
Mt. Katahdin is 14 hours away, which is more than what I would wish to drive ... but maybe in the winter it would be worth the drive. (Though they don't allow soloists in the winter. Pft!)
by nartreb » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:38 pm
by MoapaPk » Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:43 pm
by James_W » Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:54 am
KristoriaBlack wrote:These are all excellent. Thank you for the ideas. I feel like a kid in a candy store. These are going to keep me occupied for a while...
“On-trail or off?”
Either. I’m bored with following trails. Especially if I’m lucky enough to get pristine weather conditions there’s just no challenge. And if there is no challenge then what’s the point?
I should probably look to off trail. Hmmm. But I don’t entirely get how to know which rocks are climbable. Are all rocks fair game? How do I know which are rotten versus stable enough if the mighty government official does not tell me? I've done that before, I got myself up on a ridge and wanted to follow it up to the summit of some peak in France only to trigger rock avalanches (minor) as soon as I dug my ice axe into it.
by Autoxfil » Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:48 pm
James_W wrote:There is nothing worse than a large group on a mountain.
by rasgoat » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:15 pm
by nartreb » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:19 pm
by rasgoat » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:30 pm
by MoapaPk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:42 pm
by rasgoat » Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:15 am
MoapaPk wrote:Often "off-trail" in the NE means: extremely thick brush. In the old days, when the ADK 46ers were really trailless, many slide routes were chosen simply because they avoided brush (until one exited, where krumholtz got fierce).
by desainme » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:22 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests