Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them all

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
User Avatar
goldenhopper

 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:29 pm
Thanked: 558 times in 392 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by goldenhopper » Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:10 pm

Bob Sihler wrote:
Steve1215 wrote:Goldenhopper, what you've done here is you've violated Bob Sihler's Off-Route Forum Rules that say you won't dredge up petty grudges from one Forum and drag them into another one. So what if I myself have violated the sacred "General Forum" with some blunt truths? At any rate, now I'm going to add some more to my Off-Route thread that GH refers to, while he violated TOS in the process. I request that GH be permanently banned!


Sorry, Steve, but we're going to have to let Goldenhopper stay this time. You see, ever since he posted those pictures of himself in Off-Route, female membership has spiked and the elves' PM box has been flooded with requests for his email address. We might have to create his own special forum to enable him to chat with the ladies so that they'll leave the other forums, and us, alone. So you're just going to have to endure his taunts for now.


I knew it! Bob, you know I'm here to help in any way I can. Make check payable to G.D. Hopper.

And ladies remember just one at a time please. He just a man, he's just a man...

User Avatar
dskoon

 
Posts: 3122
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:06 am
Thanked: 136 times in 104 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by dskoon » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:21 pm

twoshuzz wrote:It's not only the ladies asking for GHopp's e-mail addy ! :P


:lol: Right! I mean, is he or isn't he 80% ghey?

User Avatar
goldenhopper

 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:29 pm
Thanked: 558 times in 392 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by goldenhopper » Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:07 pm

I object to these personal attacks! :D

Twoshuzz, oh forget it, the story would send this thread directly to the dark side...

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by lcarreau » Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:07 am

goldenhopper wrote:I object to these personal attacks! :D

Twoshuzz, oh forget it, the story would send this thread directly to the dark side...


Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
TheOrglingLlama

 
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:49 pm
Thanked: 94 times in 56 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by TheOrglingLlama » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:49 pm

Macbeth wrote:To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!

Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.

The following user would like to thank TheOrglingLlama for this post
lcarreau

User Avatar
JasonH

 
Posts: 6970
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:24 am
Thanked: 427 times in 295 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by JasonH » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:19 pm

Mr Leghorn wrote:Here's question that the thread hints at, are climbers only those who always climb 5.+ routes, or occasionally do, or have a few times, or never have and only do scramble or do walk-ups? Should a scrambler be ignored?


Image
I have a demon in me - Stu

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by lcarreau » Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:33 pm

Mr Leghorn wrote:Should a scrambler be ignored?


Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Sarah Simon

 
Posts: 937
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 12:01 am
Thanked: 240 times in 108 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by Sarah Simon » Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:04 am

25 December 1776

George Washington crosses the Deleware in the dead of winter...

...with no outboard motor!


Indeed, history interests many of us.
Go climb a mountain

The following user would like to thank Sarah Simon for this post
Arthur Digbee

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by lcarreau » Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:26 am

sarah.simon wrote:
George Washington crosses the Deleware in the dead of winter...

...with no outboard motor![/i]

Indeed, history interests many of us.


Sarah! For the majority of us, even paddles become useless when we don't know how to use them.

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by Bob Sihler » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:54 am

TheOrglingLlama wrote:
Macbeth wrote:To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!

Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.


Actually, Shakespeare wrote that. Or Edward de Vere, or Christopher Marlowe, or, some even claim, Queen Elizabeth I. :wink:
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by Bob Sihler » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:58 am

Steve1215 wrote:I consider scrambling (3rd-class rock?) to be actual "climbing." I think most people call it "non-technical climbing." And of course world-class alpinists spend lots of time "scrambling" un-roped over all sorts of terrain.

Walk-ups are not climbing; that's called hiking, or 2nd-class, right? Many people have told me they've "climbed" Mt. Whitney, so I ask them if they did the East Face or E. Buttress; and they tell me they walked up the trail.


For what little it may be worth, I agree. Once I'm using my hands for holds, it's climbing. Until that, it's hiking. However, if I'm off-trail and finding my own way up a mountain, I call that mountaineering even if the difficulty never exceeds Class 2.

But it's all semantics. By a dictionary definition, going up a Class 1 route to a summit is climbing.

If you'd rather be in the mountains than at the mall, that's a good start.

Of course who you "ignore" is your business. I choose to ignore all climbers born after 1970! Wimps!--


Whew! I barely made the Steve1215 cutoff! :D
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
Arthur Digbee

 
Posts: 2280
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:03 pm
Thanked: 255 times in 173 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by Arthur Digbee » Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:01 am

Steve1215 wrote:I consider scrambling (3rd-class rock?) to be actual "climbing." I think most people call it "non-technical climbing." And of course world-class alpinists spend lots of time "scrambling" un-roped over all sorts of terrain.

Walk-ups are not climbing; that's called hiking, or 2nd-class, right? Many people have told me they've "climbed" Mt. Whitney, so I ask them if they did the East Face or E. Buttress; and they tell me they walked up the trail. That's the time that I then spit in their faces!

How many times do your hands have to touch the rock to make it 3rd class?

Plus, the SP consensus has always been (wrongly IMHO) that "exposure" defines 4th class. So here's a 4th class walk-up at the crux:
Image
OCCUPY SUMMITPOST !

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by Bob Sihler » Fri Feb 25, 2011 2:18 am

Arthur Digbee wrote:How many times do your hands have to touch the rock to make it 3rd class?


Interesting question. Many times, I have been on a Class 3 route and barely touched the rock at all with my hands. But I have seen others clinging as if their very lives depended on it.

No easy answer, and yet another can of worms. When I write a route description, though, I tend not to call the route Class 3 unless there is a sustained pitch of it that can't be easily bypassed or unless there are several sections of short Class 3 pitches. Otherwise, I'll refer to it as a hike with the possibility of an occasional Class 3 move.
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
goldenhopper

 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 9:29 pm
Thanked: 558 times in 392 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by goldenhopper » Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:00 am

Bob Sihler wrote:
Arthur Digbee wrote:How many times do your hands have to touch the rock to make it 3rd class?


Interesting question. Many times, I have been on a Class 3 route and barely touched the rock at all with my hands. But I have seen others clinging as if their very lives depended on it.

No easy answer, and yet another can of worms. When I write a route description, though, I tend not to call the route Class 3 unless there is a sustained pitch of it that can't be easily bypassed or unless there are several sections of short Class 3 pitches. Otherwise, I'll refer to it as a hike with the possibility of an occasional Class 3 move.


I agree with this. I've always thought of class 3 as full time use of hands and class 4 as the same or a little harder with the addition of all but certain death exposure.

I've avoided class 4 for many years (unless it's a short move), but when I was a kid to mid-twenties I was quite stupid.

I've done some sport climbing too, but found it boooooring!

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Non-climbers are weak. Do not speak to them, ignore them

by lcarreau » Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:11 am

Hey, Steve, what about 'The Brady Bunch?' Weren't they all born before 1970 ??? :?:

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

PreviousNext

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron