by simonov » Thu May 13, 2010 8:59 pm
by Dave K » Thu May 13, 2010 9:12 pm
by Luciano136 » Thu May 13, 2010 9:28 pm
by Buz Groshong » Thu May 13, 2010 9:30 pm
Dave K wrote:I'm not that impressed with their printed maps either. Last month I bought their map of Joshua Tree NP, which omitted an obvious and still useable backcountry road. When we encountered the road while hiking, the omission caused us some navigation confusion. Maybe they got bad data from the govt., but regardless, they need to fact check their products.
Nat. Geo. should be setting the standard for good cartography, not churning out crap. To me that omission makes the whole map unreliable.
by Dave K » Thu May 13, 2010 9:49 pm
by Mountainjeff » Thu May 13, 2010 10:04 pm
by mrchad9 » Thu May 13, 2010 10:06 pm
by SoCalHiker » Thu May 13, 2010 10:19 pm
by ZeeJay » Thu May 13, 2010 11:06 pm
by OOG » Thu May 13, 2010 11:12 pm
Castlereagh wrote:What are people's thoughts on those big red DeLorme book atlases? Not quite a topo map for trails, but are they good for backroads?
by mrchad9 » Thu May 13, 2010 11:16 pm
ZeeJay wrote:However, the paper stock was a much better quality, and was made to last (even appeared to be waterproof)
ZeeJay wrote:but I didn't like that either because it was considerably more bulky and heavier.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests