Plants on the move

Mountaineering, rock climbing, and hiking news.
User Avatar
SoCalHiker

 
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Thanked: 147 times in 88 posts

Plants on the move

by SoCalHiker » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:25 pm

In the latest issue of Science scientists reported that changes in water availability between 1930 and the present day drives plant species downhill with an optimum at lower elevations. The study area was about one half of California.

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6015/324.abstract

I am not interested in a general global climate change discussion. I just want to ask whether you have noticed something like that during your years of being in the mountains and foothills. I could not think of a better audience to ask that question than here on SP :)

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by MoapaPk » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:20 pm

Which plant species did they study? (I don't subscribe to Science.)

User Avatar
A-Lex

 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:52 am
Thanked: 17 times in 4 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by A-Lex » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:47 pm

Here is a non-technical article, for those that are not AAAS members, that talks about the same thing.

http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.17/dancing ... ate-change

SoCalHiker:

If you have a link that non-members can look at I would be interested.

As to noticing these trends. No, I haven't noticed.

User Avatar
SoCalHiker

 
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Thanked: 147 times in 88 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by SoCalHiker » Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:25 pm

MoapaPk wrote:Which plant species did they study? (I don't subscribe to Science.)


A-Lex wrote:If you have a link that non-members can look at I would be interested.


sorry, don't have a link for non-subscribers :(

anyway, they analyzed over 8,000 vascular plant species and found that the "optimum elevation" for these species on average between 1930 and present day shifted downhill by about 88 meters. Apparently, these species can track regional changes in water balance and adapt by shifting downhill, despite the expected uphill shift given the increase in mean annual temperatures in California by 0.6 degrees Celsius during that time.

User Avatar
A-Lex

 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:52 am
Thanked: 17 times in 4 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by A-Lex » Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:43 pm

Oh wow. I missed the water availability bit in your original post. Interesting. Yeah the Bristlecones were definitely moving uphill per the article I linked. Interesting stuff.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by MoapaPk » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:24 pm

Bristlecones are also moving downhill in some locations.

We still have remnants white fir down to 7000' on the N sides of some desert peaks; it isn't really clear when those became isolated. SP has a dendrochronologist (ScottyS?) who has studied a lot of the mountain trees in Nevada.

There are two tree lines in high deserts area. I don't think they have well-separated the effects of H2O, CO2 and temperature on growth.

Mt Washington in the Snake Range supposedly had live Bristlecones on top 4000 years ago (or at least, 400' higher); there are remnant dead trees with no living cambium. I've always wondered how they can pull trends out for modern bristlecone zone expansion from 40 years of observation, when the trees average about 2000 years old. I'm not doubting they do it, but that would be one of the most interesting parts of the article. I've seen burned bristlecone forests now full of seedlings, but I wonder how long those will last.

User Avatar
A-Lex

 
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:52 am
Thanked: 17 times in 4 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by A-Lex » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:39 pm

Yes, you're right Moapa, the Bristlecones were moving in both directions. I didn't really re-read the article since last reading months ago, but I thought I remembered that the majority were moving uphill. There are definitely a vast number of parameters that define in which direction they migrate over time.

User Avatar
SoCalHiker

 
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Thanked: 147 times in 88 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by SoCalHiker » Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:46 pm

I think that is the interesting aspect of the study. I am certainly not an expert in this area but apparently temperature was considered by most to be the determining factor responsible for plant distribution (altitude). This study now shows some data indicating the factors other than temperature, in this case water availability and balance, is a stronger determinant for vertical distribution.

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by lcarreau » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:27 am

SoCalHiker wrote:This study now shows some data indicating the factors other than temperature, in this case water availability and balance, is a stronger determinant for vertical distribution.


I'm most certainly not an expert either, but on a recent visit to Valley of Fire State Park, I was taken aback by the water levels at Lake Mead; even though there were several storms during December 2010.

I was just wondering if "water availability" has a profound effect on desert plants. I know that
a plant called "Sticky Buckwheat" is currently endangered in the Valley of Fire area of southern Nevada.

However. some of the Desert Bighorn sheep looked healthy while I was there.
Obviously, they have the ability to find water in the most arid of places, and also find enough
grasses, shrubs, and forbs to keep them well-fed.


Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by MoapaPk » Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:43 am

Hey Lcarreau (that's gotta be a French name), bighorns do amazingly well in NV. They do without liquid water for a long time, but have the lake as a short jog to the lake.

User Avatar
Sierra Ledge Rat

 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:14 am
Thanked: 386 times in 250 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by Sierra Ledge Rat » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:01 am

I wonder how the plants walked to the lower altitudes

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Plants on the move

by lcarreau » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:23 am

MoapaPk wrote:Hey Lcarreau (that's gotta be a French name), bighorns do amazingly well in NV. They do without liquid water for a long time, but have the lake as a short jog to the lake.


Yep, all the sheep I saw were definitely SMILING !!!

:lol:

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."


Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron