New fees for National Parks

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

New fees for National Parks

by Bob Burd » Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:45 pm

Get ready for the $70 entrance fee coming to a park near you:
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHom ... ctId=75576
Comment period lasts for 30 days. Make yours now:
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/commentFor ... ntID=83652

The following user would like to thank Bob Burd for this post
96avs01, boyblue

User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by mrchad9 » Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:29 pm

The NPS is so out of control and so mismanaged I have to tip my hat to the guys who just put a fee stub on their dashboard and skip the payment. Only catch is you have to enter when no one is at the shack. But it makes sense... these people are an even bigger disaster than those in the NFS. It's a close race but the national parks can't be topped.

The US is one of the few places that charges residents and non-residents the same fees for all its nationals parks, sights, museums, etc... Maybe if they just charge non-residents 5 times as much they wouldn't have to impact everyone who pays taxes here. That's what other countries too.

Pretty bizarre as well that this is to pay for "maintenance". Mountains, lakes, and wilderness do not need to be maintained. All the other things they can put in the trash for all I care... it isn't needed.

The following user would like to thank mrchad9 for this post
Bob Sihler, boyblue, myles

User Avatar
seano

 
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:52 pm
Thanked: 132 times in 110 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by seano » Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:00 pm

What a dumb way to pay for park maintenance. I'll bet our "beautiful" border wall won't be paid for by nickel-and-dime fees charged to everyone driving through one of those annoying checkpoints 20 miles north of the border...

User Avatar
DukeJH

 
Posts: 694
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 11:12 am
Thanked: 50 times in 41 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by DukeJH » Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:33 pm

Buy the annual pass. It's one of the few values left.

I remember my first trip into SEKI over Army Pass. I expected a pay booth but only saw a sign.

User Avatar
Scott M.

 
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 2:23 pm
Thanked: 42 times in 33 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by Scott M. » Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:43 pm

If the following from CNN's report remains true it will be senseless to buy anything but the annual pass if you plan at least two entries per year to the featured list of locations.
From CNN Travel: "The cost of the annual pass, which permits entrance into all federal lands and parks, would remain at $80."

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by Bob Burd » Wed Oct 25, 2017 9:15 pm

The $80 annual pass will not remain $80 if the new fees go into effect, of that you can be sure. Once they see that the crowds will still come, the annual pass will be the next obvious target.

The following user would like to thank Bob Burd for this post
Bob Sihler

User Avatar
jdzaharia

 
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:48 pm
Thanked: 69 times in 50 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by jdzaharia » Wed Oct 25, 2017 9:31 pm

So, under that proposal, visitors to those 17 parks, during their peak times, will be subsidizing the entire balance of the NPS system?

The following user would like to thank jdzaharia for this post
chicagotransplant

User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by mrchad9 » Wed Oct 25, 2017 10:20 pm

Bob is correct... annual pass will be a target shortly.

Seniors used to be able to buy lifetime passes for $10... and just last August that went up to $80. I wouldn't be surprised if annual passes soon go up to $140 or more. They will be looking at all these people visiting Yosemite and Yellowstone willing to pay $70 for a week and it won't be long before they realize they can squeeze everyone for $140 a year. In the long run they will keep annual passes about double a single entry... just raising one a bit before the other.

I think this is all part of the (successful) plan to keep Americans fat and lazy.

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by lcarreau » Thu Oct 26, 2017 2:50 am

Chad is correct. The American taxpayer gets screwed again, but it's even a BIGGER shame the singer who sang "Ain't It a Shame" Chubby Checker died today at 89.
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Thanked: 2763 times in 1527 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by Bob Sihler » Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:30 am

mrchad9 wrote:
I think this is all part of the (successful) plan to keep Americans fat and lazy.


Usually, I laugh at conspiracy theories and those who buy into them, but given what the current administration has been up to regarding public lands, I have to wonder if this is an attempt to erode support for public lands and make it easier to sell or lease them.

The national parks are sometimes a shitshow, but they still open the outdoors to people of almost all means at a great value. These increases could price a lot of families out. Theodore Roosevelt would have shut this down.
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)

User Avatar
boyblue

 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 9:30 am
Thanked: 111 times in 66 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by boyblue » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:38 am

I bought a Senior Pass last July at Crater Lake NP for $10. I knew it was slated to increase dramatically by the end of the year, so this was a high priority on our visit. Certainly one of the best returns I'll ever have for such a small investment. :-) Just need to stay in reasonable shape and health until my retirement in a few years (and beyond) so I can really make good use of it.

FYI, I paid a lot of visits to the local NPs in California back in the 70's and 80's. I think daily fees were only about $2.00 a vehicle back then- increasing to a whopping $5.00 a vehicle by the end of that period. I usually bought a Golden Eagle every year for about $15.00 to save some money. The 1982 equivalent to 2017's $70 was almost $30. I'm pretty sure I would have paid it and sacrificed some of my other pleasures such as records and video rentals- maybe even alcohol and weed (I don't know. I'm glad I didn't have to make that decision :o ).
3 Passports.jpg
3 Passports.jpg (234.88 KiB) Viewed 8495 times

The following user would like to thank boyblue for this post
chugach mtn boy, lcarreau, seano

User Avatar
chicagotransplant

 
Posts: 1426
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:16 pm
Thanked: 760 times in 475 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by chicagotransplant » Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:43 pm

My dad got the 65+ pass for $10 a few years ago, great deal! Sad to see that went up 8 fold.

I had the RMNP season pass when I was still chasing a lot of the 13K peaks in the park, but as I moved on to other areas in the state I haven't gotten it again, I think it was $40 last time I got it. Its now up to $60.

Certainly the trend seems to be moving to increase the use fees, especially in light of the current budget cutting NPS funding by like 12%. I think that is the percentage I read anyway (sorry, no source).

Most of my NPS visits involve parking at a trailhead, hiking, and maybe using the trailhead bathroom. Is that really worth $70? I do the same thing at countless other trailheads on National Forest or BLM land with no fee. Sure not all of them have a toilet, but a good number do and are still "free". I know, its not really free because of my income taxes but that is where I would rather pay for it.

I personally think the a-la-carte type of fees are a bad model and would rather the parks are funded by our income taxes. They are a benefit for everyone, even if they choose not visit, and to me it makes sense to keep them paid for by everyone. Not just hit up the people who visit them with higher and higher fees. My thought would be if they really need to increase fees to cover their budgets, why not just increase everyone's income taxes by $80 (the current rate of the annual pass) and you don't have to pay an entrance fee?

User Avatar
mstender

 
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:40 pm
Thanked: 8 times in 5 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by mstender » Thu Oct 26, 2017 9:32 pm

lcarreau wrote:but it's even a BIGGER shame the singer who sang "Ain't It a Shame" Chubby Checker died today at 89.

It was Fats Domino who died yesterday at the age of 89.

The following user would like to thank mstender for this post
lcarreau

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by lcarreau » Fri Oct 27, 2017 3:03 am

mstender wrote:
lcarreau wrote:but it's even a BIGGER shame the singer who sang "Ain't It a Shame" Chubby Checker died today at 89.

It was Fats Domino who died yesterday at the age of 89.


Great eyes ! There I go listening to Fake news again ... won't reveal the source, because I don't want to turn this thread into another political slug-fest.

Actually, it's all Teddy Roosevelt's fault ... :wink:
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
stinkysox77

 
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 7:22 pm
Thanked: 158 times in 110 posts

Re: New fees for National Parks

by stinkysox77 » Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:35 pm

lcarreau wrote:Chad is correct. The American taxpayer gets screwed again, but it's even a BIGGER shame the singer who sang "Ain't It a Shame" Chubby Checker died today at 89.


The average taxpayer was the once getting screwed before the price increase. Why not make the people use the park pay for the park? Personally I'm tired of a disproportionately small percentage of americans benefiting from the national parks when every american is having to pay for them. It doesn't seem that unreasonable to have the people who visit the parks pay for the upkeep and maintenance of the parks.

The following user would like to thank stinkysox77 for this post
lcarreau

Next

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests