ArtVandelay wrote:...The certification at least assures you that this person knows what he is doing.
It does?
They may know how to do it, but it doesn't necessarily mean that they can actually perform their duties when the shit hits the fan. Actual performance of ones guiding duties comes from years of experience and having to actually perform them in real world setting.
There are folks out there that are fully cert'd that have completely failed the test when confronted with a real scenario. I know of several individuals out there that have no cert and have stood tall when called upon to perform when things went south.
There is no CERT process out there that replaces the true test of real world experience...none.
I believe that one of the things that the AMGA should consider implementing into their process, is to have a probation period in a real world setting. Maybe one year. Unless of course one can show/prove significant experience to fulfill this req.
In the Navy, our Qualification Standards were composed of 25% formal instruction and 75% OJT in the actual situ. This OJT period is a lengthy time of observation of ones abilities in the performance of the actual job. The Navy's system truly puts the individual to the test. It believes that just cuz one can pass a test in a controlled environment, doesn't make them "Qualified" to perform their duties when shit hits the fan.
Something to think about.