Locked threads

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
User Avatar
hansw

 
Posts: 5346
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:52 pm
Thanked: 22 times in 16 posts

by hansw » Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:52 am

Image

User Avatar
mvs

 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 7:44 pm
Thanked: 307 times in 123 posts

by mvs » Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:35 pm

hansw wrote:Image


That is great hansw! :)

User Avatar
TheOrglingLlama

 
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:49 pm
Thanked: 94 times in 56 posts

by TheOrglingLlama » Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:44 pm

mconnell wrote:llamas make better lovers!


Of course ! :mrgreen:

User Avatar
Castlereagh

 
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:46 pm
Thanked: 213 times in 147 posts

by Castlereagh » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:06 pm

Lolli wrote:
Aaron Johnson wrote:
Or are you going to instead lock / delete this thread?


I have personally locked no threads.


Impressive solidarity.


Normal rule of management is to present a unified face and never show dissent outward after making a decision.
Another one is to not backstab others in same management group by undermining their decisions.


What about making passive aggressive comments to your managers when you disagree with them? As a manager myself I would not stand for that, personally.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

by Bob Burd » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:23 pm

Lolli wrote:
Aaron Johnson wrote:
Or are you going to instead lock / delete this thread?


I have personally locked no threads.


Impressive solidarity.


Normal rule of management is to present a unified face and never show dissent outward after making a decision.
Another one is to not backstab others in same management group by undermining their decisions.


Well, none of us claimed to be "normal". :)

I could make a similar statement, "I have banned no one since PnP was removed." (true, btw)
That doesn't mean I disagree with the bannings that were done. And I didn't take Aaron's statement as a backstab in any sense. I believe he stated previously that he supported steps taken by other elves. Undoubtedly we have different styles, I think that is to be expected. But we all have what we believe are SP's best interests in mind and more importantly, trust each other to have that same regard.

User Avatar
TheOrglingLlama

 
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:49 pm
Thanked: 94 times in 56 posts

by TheOrglingLlama » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:25 pm

patssox09 wrote:As a manager myself


A Japanese company and an American company decided to have a canoe race on
the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak
performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile. The Americans, very discouraged
and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.

A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and
recommend appropriate action. Their conclusion was the Japanese had eight
people rowing and one person steering, while the American team had eight
people steering and one person rowing.

So American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large
amount of money for a second opinion. They advised that too many people were
steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.

To prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management
structure was totally reorganized to four steering supervisors, three area
steering superintendents and one assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the one
person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the
"Rowing Team Quality First Program", with meetings, dinners and free pens
for the rower.

There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment,
extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated, the American
management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a
new canoe, sold the paddles and cancelled all capital investments for new
equipment.

The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses, and the
next year's racing team was outsourced to India.

:mrgreen:

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

by Bob Burd » Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:30 pm

butitsadryheat wrote:Apparently there were some (group of users? Advertisers? chief elf?) that had the final say, but Aaron couldn't/wouldn't discuss it further.


None that I'm aware of.
We refer to Gangolf as the Uber Elf because he is better at the mechanics of getting things fixed/changed in SP, but there is no one elf to rule them all.

Advertisers? None of the elves could care an iota about the adverts, and we've never heard from the owners that we should (or even that they do). The ads pay for the server and disk space and that's about it. We laugh when we here people talk about the lost revenue from PnP's demise. Really.

Group of users? Sounds like more wild speculation.

User Avatar
Gangolf Haub
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9436
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:28 pm
Thanked: 1046 times in 753 posts

by Gangolf Haub » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:04 pm

Lolli wrote:
Aaron Johnson wrote:
Or are you going to instead lock / delete this thread?


I have personally locked no threads.


Impressive solidarity.


Normal rule of management is to present a unified face and never show dissent outward after making a decision.
Another one is to not backstab others in same management group by undermining their decisions.


Not helpful, Lolli. Not at all. But if you prefer we can team up for once and give you a fair verbal beating. According to true management style of course.

And for the record - I also locked no threads. Actually had to be told how this works by the other guys. So much for über-elf!

Still, I think I should rule them ...

User Avatar
Castlereagh

 
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:46 pm
Thanked: 213 times in 147 posts

by Castlereagh » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:27 pm

Lolli wrote:
Gangolf Haub wrote:Not helpful, Lolli. Not at all. But if you prefer we can team up for once and give you a fair verbal beating. According to true management style of course.

And for the record - I also locked no threads. Actually had to be told how this works by the other guys. So much for über-elf!

Still, I think I should rule them ...


Actually, you're wrong, it was helpful. I'm sure you're smart enough to see how, if you think about it.
But maybe I instead should have accused you elves of being powerhungry, destroying the site by deleting PnP, make people leave, and... I forgot what else right now. That'd be helpful? :wink:



I think a pretty obvious moral to be drawn from the Decline and Fall of PnP is that two wrongs don't make a right.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

by Bob Burd » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:06 pm

butitsadryheat wrote:Aaron said we have no idea of what goes on behind the scenes, and I agee. We don't, but when asked, it can't be discussed? so it shouldn't be referred to then


Sometimes we're a bit melodramatic. I think any truly rational person can guess fairly well what goes on and it isn't very mysterious or all that unknowable. However, if you believe in power-hungry elves and secret cabals and nefarious purposes, there is no limit to what your imagination may conjure up. I've been happy to discuss this stuff with folks who ask, but not a whole lot via the forums. I gave up trying to defend myself from the many accusations years ago. It's an impossible task that never ends. People will believe what they want to believe.

User Avatar
rhyang

 
Posts: 8960
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 8:55 pm
Thanked: 59 times in 38 posts

by rhyang » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:10 pm

All jokes aside -- thanks elves for the work you do :)

I wish I were more like .. oops, never mind ;)

no avatar
Dave K
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7909
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 2:40 pm
Thanked: 77 times in 39 posts

by Dave K » Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:12 pm

more like .. wrote:All jokes aside -- thanks elves for the work you do :)

I wish I were more like .. oops, never mind ;)


Oh boy...



:lol:

PreviousNext

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron