by markv » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:18 pm
I'm not a hardcore climber, and i wanted to climb Gannett. It took 3 shots at it, both roped, not roped, and from 2 different routes. I did some research along the way.
What i came up with is that aside from the bergschrund, nobody had any accounts or record of a climber falling into a crevasse on the Gooseneck Glacier. (the steep one near the summit) However, there had in the past (the 70s or 80s) been deaths from crevasse fall on the Dinwoody Glacier. (the big broad one crossed from Titcomb Basin)
What's more, by far the biggest problems people had had on Gannett was weather-related. So, we decided the best thing for us to do (at this point me and my girlfriend), was to come from Dubois instead of Titcomb Basin. That way we could leave the technical gear and rope behind entirely, avoid Dinwoody Glacier, and climb quicker up Gooseneck Glacier. We went earlier in the year than you will be going, so we just stayed on snow. The bergschrund had a good snowbridge, and other than that we saw no crevasses. It worked out well. We slipped right in between 2 little storms.
This is compared to coming from Titcomb and crossing the Dinwoody, where we saw some crevasses (shallow though) and crevasse lines, but both times got turned back by weather.
That's my .02 worth. Thing is, next time i go back, i STILL want to go the Titcomb route, just because it's so beautiful. But now i've already made the summit and so that wouldn't be a priority.