Day Hiker wrote:SoCalHiker wrote:dskoon wrote:I always thought Alpenglow was that pinkish color casting itself on the opposite surface,(in this case, mountains), from the sunset and most certainly, after the sunset. An example from my neck of the woods.
Really nice photo. That certainly seems to qualify by my interpretation.
The Sun has set at the photographer's viewpoint, but by the shadows on Hood, the Sun looks to be at least partially visible from points up on the mountain. Is that true? If so, it would not qualify as alpenglow as defined in your post.SoCalHiker wrote:Also, "Alpenglow" in its truest meaning is not illumination of the mountain with the last rays of the setting sun. It appears <b>after</b> the sun set and the mountain is illuminated <b>indirectly</b> by the sunrays that reflect from clouds or particles in the sky.
Dayhiker, you're right; my mistake, and I confess that's not my photo, just one I pillaged that I felt fit my definition. Good eyes, you have, as we've all long known. Guess I didn't look closely enough at the upper, sunlit part, but was mesmorized by the pink.
I don't know. I'll let you guys hash out the scientific differences of particles and light refractions. Interesting stuff and a great discussion, along with photos.
Again, I was felt that when I was witnessing Alpenglow, it was more like the afterglow of the sunset, that pinkish twilight reflecting on the mountains, and not sunlight spilling over the horizon which obstructs your own view of the sunset.
Carry on.
And. . . so I guess by my definition, in the pic I provided, the lower part of the mountain is bathed in Alpenglow, while the upper, last sunlight on the rocks, is not Alpenglow, but rather, simply the remaining rays of sunlight.