Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

As El Niño grows stronger, so does hope for a wet winter...

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.

Postby x15x15 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:11 am

asmrz wrote:

BTW. x15x15, Bill Bragg and I arrived at Humber Park late in the evening May 27, 1977. We slept in my car and woke up to 8 inches of snow, wind and fog. We bailed to J Tree. That is the latest significant snow I remember in So. Ca.


that's what is great about so cal. and to think, everyone thinks this place is all crowds, beach and smog!

one year, not too long ago, wallspeck and i climbed the trough in full ice conditions in May. CRAZY!!!
User Avatar
x15x15

 
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 4:48 pm
Thanked: 23 times in 16 posts

Postby Iron Hiker » Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:50 pm

Climbed Cuyamaca Peak yesterday, easily a foot of snow on top, though it was melting fast at the bottom (no more than 1/2 foot at Paso Picacho, probably mostly gone by now). It was definitely a surreal experience, and I'm glad my snow boots got at least one workout this "winter!" (I'm a SoCal transplant from the Northeast USA!)

As of now Palomar to the north of here (Escondido) still shines white in its snowy brilliance......
Bring on more snow(?) next week! 8)
User Avatar
Iron Hiker

 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2001 1:00 pm
Location: Escondido, California, United States
Thanked: 2 times in 1 post

Postby butitsadryheat » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:49 pm

Iron Hiker wrote:Climbed Cuyamaca Peak yesterday, easily a foot of snow on top, though it was melting fast at the bottom (no more than 1/2 foot at Paso Picacho, probably mostly gone by now). It was definitely a surreal experience, and I'm glad my snow boots got at least one workout this "winter!" (I'm a SoCal transplant from the Northeast USA!)

As of now Palomar to the north of here (Escondido) still shines white in its snowy brilliance......
Bring on more snow(?) next week! 8)


Welcome to Cali. Cuyamaca must have looked kinda cool with all those black, burned tree trunks. How is the recovery coming up there?
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Recovery slow....

Postby Iron Hiker » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:36 am

It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf
User Avatar
Iron Hiker

 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2001 1:00 pm
Location: Escondido, California, United States
Thanked: 2 times in 1 post

Re: Recovery slow....

Postby butitsadryheat » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:21 am

Iron Hiker wrote:It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf


I don't FB, but thanks. If those photos are somewhere else, please let me know. I'd like to see'em, as I haven't seen it in spring in awhile (cousin has a cabin that survived). I saw lots of oaks that made it, but only a few pines. The drainages were thick with tiger lillies. Good to hear some pines are still fighting and recovering.
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Re: Recovery slow....

Postby peninsula » Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:33 am

butitsadryheat wrote:
Iron Hiker wrote:It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf


I don't FB, but thanks. If those photos are somewhere else, please let me know. I'd like to see'em, as I haven't seen it in spring in awhile (cousin has a cabin that survived). I saw lots of oaks that made it, but only a few pines. The drainages were thick with tiger lillies. Good to hear some pines are still fighting and recovering.


I once had a client, a guy in forestry management. He had some interesting insight. He told me in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, there were 13 known species of an ancient, 1300-plus-year old pine tree (I forget the name). Only one survived the Cedar Fire. It is an example of an irreversible loss produce by such a massive wildfire. Certainly looks much better in short time, yet a very long ways from where it was.
User Avatar
peninsula

 
Posts: 1646
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:10 am
Location: San Diego, California, United States
Thanked: 47 times in 34 posts

Re: Recovery slow....

Postby butitsadryheat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:01 am

peninsula wrote:
butitsadryheat wrote:
Iron Hiker wrote:It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf


I don't FB, but thanks. If those photos are somewhere else, please let me know. I'd like to see'em, as I haven't seen it in spring in awhile (cousin has a cabin that survived). I saw lots of oaks that made it, but only a few pines. The drainages were thick with tiger lillies. Good to hear some pines are still fighting and recovering.


I once had a client, a guy in forestry management. He had some interesting insight. He told me in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, there were 13 known species of an ancient, 1300-plus-year old pine tree (I forget the name). Only one survived the Cedar Fire. It is an example of an irreversible loss produce by such a massive wildfire. Certainly looks much better in short time, yet a very long ways from where it was.


Wow, sad to hear that. That fire was incredible. I have a picture form the LA times of it when it was approaching my cousins cabin. It is amazing their cabin survived. Apparently, the huge oak that was on one side of it absorbed most of the heat, and saved it. The oak survived as well.
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Re: Recovery slow....

Postby peninsula » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:13 am

butitsadryheat wrote:
peninsula wrote:
butitsadryheat wrote:
Iron Hiker wrote:It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf


I don't FB, but thanks. If those photos are somewhere else, please let me know. I'd like to see'em, as I haven't seen it in spring in awhile (cousin has a cabin that survived). I saw lots of oaks that made it, but only a few pines. The drainages were thick with tiger lillies. Good to hear some pines are still fighting and recovering.


I once had a client, a guy in forestry management. He had some interesting insight. He told me in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, there were 13 known species of an ancient, 1300-plus-year old pine tree (I forget the name). Only one survived the Cedar Fire. It is an example of an irreversible loss produce by such a massive wildfire. Certainly looks much better in short time, yet a very long ways from where it was.


Wow, sad to hear that. That fire was incredible. I have a picture form the LA times of it when it was approaching my cousins cabin. It is amazing their cabin survived. Apparently, the huge oak that was on one side of it absorbed most of the heat, and saved it. The oak survived as well.


Check that... "13 known specimens", not "species". Anyway, more to the point, it is amazing that the cabin survived. I have heard such stories, homes surviving among all surrounding homes burned beyond recognition. To think an oak tree could buffer a home from wildfire is interesting and the first time I have heard such a conclusion. I have a couple of large oaks growing up against my place and had hoped eliminating ladder fuel would do the trick. Your post encourages my confidence.

After the Cedar fire, people started cutting down burned oaks taking them for dead until the county put out an advisory encouraging landowners to give burned oaks a chance to recover prior to their removal. Recover they did! You can see tell tale signs of a survivor, but to an untrained eye, one would not know the difference.
User Avatar
peninsula

 
Posts: 1646
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:10 am
Location: San Diego, California, United States
Thanked: 47 times in 34 posts

Re: Recovery slow....

Postby butitsadryheat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:34 am

peninsula wrote:
butitsadryheat wrote:
peninsula wrote:
butitsadryheat wrote:
Iron Hiker wrote:It'll take a while. There are already green plants sprouting up between the dead tree snags, and seedlings have been planted, but it will take many many years to recover. The summit area does have a few nice pines left that they managed to save from the fire.

Take a look here for some pics: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... 513&ref=mf


I don't FB, but thanks. If those photos are somewhere else, please let me know. I'd like to see'em, as I haven't seen it in spring in awhile (cousin has a cabin that survived). I saw lots of oaks that made it, but only a few pines. The drainages were thick with tiger lillies. Good to hear some pines are still fighting and recovering.


I once had a client, a guy in forestry management. He had some interesting insight. He told me in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, there were 13 known species of an ancient, 1300-plus-year old pine tree (I forget the name). Only one survived the Cedar Fire. It is an example of an irreversible loss produce by such a massive wildfire. Certainly looks much better in short time, yet a very long ways from where it was.


Wow, sad to hear that. That fire was incredible. I have a picture form the LA times of it when it was approaching my cousins cabin. It is amazing their cabin survived. Apparently, the huge oak that was on one side of it absorbed most of the heat, and saved it. The oak survived as well.


Check that... "13 known specimens", not "species". Anyway, more to the point, it is amazing that the cabin survived. I have heard such stories, homes surviving among all surrounding homes burned beyond recognition. To think an oak tree could buffer a home from wildfire is interesting and the first time I have heard such a conclusion. I have a couple of large oaks growing up against my place and had hoped eliminating ladder fuel would do the trick. Your post encourages my confidence.

After the Cedar fire, people started cutting down burned oaks taking them for dead until the county put out an advisory encouraging landowners to give burned oaks a chance to recover prior to their removal. Recover they did! You can see tell tale signs of a survivor, but to an untrained eye, one would not know the difference.


Apparently, the tree was hundreds of years old (very large) and was able to smolder and smolder, and absorb the heat without erupting. It was limbed up quite a bit, so the flames from the ground didn't get up into the canopy. Truly a miracle. Only nine cabins out of several dozen in their area survived. Most surrounded by large oaks, but cleared of brush. Those that burned were surrounded by pines. I'll see if I can get more info about it from my cousin as to the theory about why they were more protected.

Here is a photo of one of the big trees that burned. May have been on of the older ones. It was huge.

Image
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Postby dskoon » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:56 am

Guess that's a testament to hard Oak for ya. Soft Pine. Your cousin sounds a bit lucky. Fate gave him the cabin surrounded by Oak.
That's what I want to see(if you don't mind), is a picture of your cousin's cabin and that oak still standing next to it. Couple photos of the areas that got scorched would be nice too. If it's not asking too much. :wink:

Your cousin is lucky. The oak held up pretty well on Old Ironsides as well.
User Avatar
dskoon

 
Posts: 3096
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:06 am
Location: portland, Oregon
Thanked: 123 times in 93 posts

Postby butitsadryheat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:36 am

dskoon wrote:Guess that's a testament to hard Oak for ya. Soft Pine. Your cousin sounds a bit lucky. Fate gave him the cabin surrounded by Oak.
That's what I want to see(if you don't mind), is a picture of your cousin's cabin and that oak still standing next to it. Couple photos of the areas that got scorched would be nice too. If it's not asking too much. :wink:

Your cousin is lucky. The oak held up pretty well on Old Ironsides as well.


Lucky indeed.

Don't believe me, eh? :wink:

Here it is (cropped for obvious reasons, and I'll pull it later) but you can see it above the cabin in the back there, and that was a few years after the fire, and it was just getting growing again. You can see a large branch on the ground. That was one of the branches that didn't make it, and came down later.

Image

I would be remiss if I didn't mention that a metal roof had been put on just a year or so before the fire. Had they been cedar shake, as many are/were, I'm sure the outcome would've have been different.

This was one big fire. Check this out. (Yes, in the lower right hand corner is San Diego)
http://map.sdsu.edu/fire2003/movies/Cedar.mov

Image
Why are oaks fire resistant?

* The thick bark of oaks is very fire resistant and has low thermal conductivity so that heat does not penetrate well to the living tissues underneath.
* Oaks form dormant buds at the base of the trunk. These buds are protected from fire by the root collars. These dormant buds are below the soil surface where they are protected from the lethal effects of fire. If the stem is killed by fire, one or more of these dormant buds grow.
* Oak saplings become resistant to fire when they are smaller than those of other tree species.
* Oak saplings subject to periodic (annual) fires produce extensive root systems even if top-killed. These large root systems permit better growth of shoots in fire-free years.
* Tree competitors are destroyed by fire, thus permitting selective oak reproduction.


http://oaksavannas.org/geography.html
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Postby dskoon » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:37 pm

Thanks.
I did believe you, just wanted a couple photos. Pretty nice "cabin," there.
Metal roof in fire-prone areas, very smart.

Wow, that last photo is something. Looks like a bomb went off.
User Avatar
dskoon

 
Posts: 3096
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:06 am
Location: portland, Oregon
Thanked: 123 times in 93 posts

Postby butitsadryheat » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:13 pm

did you watch the link to the time lapse of the path of the fire?
User Avatar
butitsadryheat

 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Bakersfield, California, United States
Thanked: 946 times in 688 posts

Postby peninsula » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:29 pm

dskoon wrote:Thanks.
I did believe you, just wanted a couple photos. Pretty nice "cabin," there.
Metal roof in fire-prone areas, very smart.

Wow, that last photo is something. Looks like a bomb went off.


It was a bomb, 100 thousand acres burned in less than 24 hours. I was in Pine Valley not far from the ignition point. From Pine Valley, with a strong Santa Ana kicking up, there was no trace of the inferno. That first morning, I rode my MT bike to the top of the mountain above PV for an unobstructed view to the ocean. I could not believe my eyes! Nothing but smoke! I got down the mountain as fast as I could to turn on the TV. By the time the Cedar fire was over, we were cleaning ash for the next year. Every time the wind blew, more ash would spread.
User Avatar
peninsula

 
Posts: 1646
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:10 am
Location: San Diego, California, United States
Thanked: 47 times in 34 posts

Postby Deleted User » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:27 pm

peninsula wrote: I remember the 97 El Nino, I was catching big yellow tail off the coast of LaJolla from a kayak having the time of my life!


I remember that! We were catching dorado off Catalina and the albies made it WAY up north (Oregon or something like that). That was a wierd summer. Killer whales off the west end of Catalina, 500# bluefin schools getting gobbled up by the purse sieners, and striped marlin off Santa Barbara Island.

ahhh... isn't global warming fun.
Deleted User

 
Posts: 16737675
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:07 am
Thanked: 9 times in 5 posts

PreviousNext

Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.